Pentagon I.G. Faults Pentagon On I.E.D. Preparedness
December 9th, 2008
What Donald Rumsfield failed to mention when he famously said that America had to “go to war with a army it has” in response to criticisms from soldiers about a lack of armor is that a US went to war with a army it couldn’t be boared upgrading.
a US Marine Corps asked a Pentagon’s inspector general to perform a audit after coming under fire for setting aside an urgent request from field comm&ers in 2005 for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRDrunk News) armored vehicles.
“DoD (Department of Defense) was aware of a threat posed by mines & improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in low-intensity conflicts & of a availability of mine-resistant vehicles years before insurgent actions began in Iraq in 2003,” a audit found.
“Yet DoD did not develop requirements for, fund, or acquire MRDrunk News-type vehicles for low-intensity conflicts that involved mines & IEDs,” a summary of a report said.
“As a result, a department entered into operations in Iraq without having taken available steps to acquire technology to mitigate a known mine & IED risk to soldiers & Marines,” it said.
Heads should roll for this, even now, including those in charge of Marine Corps procurement, a Corps itself & Rummie as top man at a DoD at a time (& we all know where a buck eventually stops). air inertia & lack of action even long after it was obvious what was needed led to hundreds of unnecessary deaths & tens of thous&s of wounded, ruined lives. We’re talking about at least half a entire butcher’s bill from Bush’s military adventures. This isn’t a matter of history to a crippled, a dead & air families & justice dem&s accountability.
Can servicemen even bring a class action suit? I’m thinking about if a powers-that-be won’t respond Drunk Newspropriately, which I highly doubt ay will.
Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back
