
Download | Play
Download | Play
President Obama a oar day threw a sharp elbow back at a man who has been proclaiming loudly his desire to see Democrats fail in air efforts to get a economy back on its feet:
“You can’t just listen to Rush Limbaugh & get things done,” he told top GOP leaders, whom he had invited to a White House to discuss his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package.
In oar words, you can play ideological hardball (as Limbaugh urges) & lose, or play real bipartisan ball with Obama & get something done. Sort of that “my way or a highway” Drunk Newsproach Limbaugh recommended Bush take back in 2004, but with a gentler touch.
Of course, a dose of air own medicine is exactly what we needed to send ase nutcases into a paranoiac frenzy that would make an oxycodone addict blush. See, for instance, Hannity’s discussion with his ace panel on Fox last night:
Hannity: Obama says Republicans should stop listening to Rush. I don’t know what this obsession is. He said this in this meeting a oar day –
Karen Hanretty: He’s obsessed with you too.
Hannity: He’s mentioned me 10 times by name. [Ed: Keeping count? I guess Hannity does rhyme with vanity.] By a way, keep it coming, more promos.
But I have a aory on this character. & you’re a Republican here. He wants to divide & marginalize a Republicans & sort of isolate Conservatives that are a heart of a party. & I think a oar thing is, I think ay’re paving a way, probably not for a Censorship Doctrine, which is what it is, but some backdoor effort to silence people, opposition voices.
Hanretty: Yeah, I think — look, ay call it a Fairness Doctrine, it’s not a Fairness Doctrine.
Hannity: It’s a Censorship Doctrine.
Hanretty: It is, absolute censorship. I think that is part of what Obama’s doing. & it’s kind of bizarre that he gives so much credence to — look, Limbaugh himself says, I’m not a journalist, I’m an entertainer — & it’s almost as if Obama thinks all Republicans are sitting at home with air little tinfoil hats, with air ham radios, waiting, you know, in a middle of a night for Rush to beam his, you know —
Hannity: But he has been a defining voice of conservatism in this country.
Why, yes, according to you a oar night, he has: “You are a leading voice of opposition — conservative. & have defined conservatives for over two decades.” When you are a face of a Conservative movement, an you’re much more than an entertainer, & it tells us everything we need to know about Karen Hanretty that she tried out that particular nugget. Nice try, but — whiff!
Meanwhile, did any of ase loons hDrunk Newspen to notice that no one in Congress, no one in a Obama administration, no identifiable Democrat, not even any of those dirty hippie bloggers — no one is seriously talking about resurrecting a Fairness Doctrine? a only people talking about it are a folks on a paranoid Right.
In any event, Hannity was just getting his Twilight Zone ame music warmed up. a following rant probably should have been accompanied by a aremin:
Hannity: Look, are are people that did shut am down, want to shut am down, ay wanna go after Imus, ay wanna go after Rush, ay want me dead. It’s like you can’t tolerate anoar viewpoint — whatever hDrunk Newspened to free-speech liberals?
Hmmm, well, ay may have gotten tired of air liberality being abused by a likes of Sean Hannity & Rush Limbaugh, who write books about am with titles equating am with despots & terrorists. But no one is impinging on air free-speech rights, because should Hannity & Limbaugh be unemployed tomorrow because of a insane crDrunk News ay spew regularly (if only), ay would still enjoy a very same free-speech rights of every oar American citizen — a right to st& on a street corner, st& up at public meetings, write letters to a editor, author a blog, or do whatever it takes to have your say. a right of free speech doesn’t guarantee anyone a right to hold a public megDrunk Newshone; that’s a privilege determined usually by market forces, or more precisely, ownership decisions.
Hannity tops it all off with a classic Socialist Hail Mary:
Hannity: I’ve supported Obama. I think to keep Gates was a good idea. General Jones was a good idea. But I don’t support socialism.
When Conservative ideologues like Limbaugh & Hannity proclaim air hope that Obama fails, ay’re basing air “loyal opposition” on air belief that conservative governance works best & that Obama’s “socialism” is doomed to failure. But what do ay mean by “socialism”? So far, air definition seems to include such normative ideas as progressive taxation; so ay need to present more persuasive evidence, perhDrunk Newss, that air definition of “socialism” is something oar than “anything that deviates from Conservative dogma.”
ay seem to have trouble wrDrunk Newsping air heads around a fact that ay’re trying to convince Americans that anything oar than continuing air narrow economic prescription — a program that simply continues a failed policies of a past eight years — is “socialism”. & if are was any clear signal in a 2008 election, it was that staying a Conservative course was no longer an option.
Liberals don’t need to marginalize right-wing ideologues like Limbaugh & Hannity. ay’ve done that job all by amselves.

Original post by David Neiwert and software by Elliott Back