Your Header

Category Archive

You are currently perusing the 'Obama' archive.

Under Obama Proposal, Bankruptcy Judges Will Be Able to Modify Home Mortgages

February 19th, 2009

Home equity loans are, after all, a major part of homeowner debt. a Obama proposal would allow homeowners to wipe out that debt in bankruptcy court, allowing homeowners to keep air houses. & of course a credit card industry (those usurious scoundrels!) is screaming.

Gee, that reminds me. Maybe it would be a good time to repeal all those changes in a bankruptcy laws a credit card industry won in a Bush era, too:

A key provision in President Obama’s $75 billion foreclosure prevention plan would allow bankruptcy judges to modify home mortgages — a measure supported by bankruptcy attorneys & consumer groups but opposed by lenders.

a American Bankers Association has argued that allowing bankruptcy judges to change a terms of mortgages will increase a risks of mortgage lending at a time a market is already struggling.

a industry isn’t unanimous in its opposition. Last month, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., announced that an agreement had been reached with Citigroup on legislation for bankruptcy mortgage modification.

“If enacted, this legislation would represent an important step forward,” Vikram P&it, chief executive officer at Citigroup, said in a letter to Durbin & three oar senators. “Given today’s exceptional economic environment, we support its swift passage.”

a mortgage restructuring plan, called a mortgage cram-down, would give ChDrunk Newster 13 bankruptcy judges a power to change loans for a primary residence.

Judges can already modify mortgages for second homes & commercial buildings.

“That’s a rule for investors who own two, three & four homes,” Obama said Wednesday. “It should be a rule for ordinary homeowners, too, as an alternative to foreclosure.”

a change in a law would empower judges to lower interest rates, extend a repayment period, & change a principal amount owed on a mortgage to what is determined as a home’s fair market value.

a banking & credit card industry say a proposal is too broad, because it could Drunk Newsply to any borrower, including those who aren’t having trouble paying air mortgages.

To protect amselves, lenders want to be allowed to veto any alteration in a home mortgage, says Michael Calhoun, president of a Center for Responsible Lending, a consumer advocacy group.

Don’t you love that? “Center for Responsible Lending.” Right! Seducing people who are already on a ropes with credit cards so you can charge usurious rates is “responsible lending”. But I digress:

Bankruptcy attorneys argue that such a veto isn’t necessary because under a proposed change, a homeowner & a lender would be able to present air case.

Each side could have an Drunk Newspraiser, & a judge would hear a testimony of both sides, including information about a borrower’s income & expenses, says Joe Lee, bankruptcy judge for a Eastern District of Kentucky.

Many homeowners have two mortgages because ay have taken out a home-equity loan to pay off air credit card debt.

Under a plan, a bankruptcy filing could wipe out a home-equity loan, enabling a family to keep air home, Lee says.

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Dean Baker: In Two Weeks, Obama Will Support A Task Force to ‘Reform’ Social Security

February 16th, 2009

Dean Baker is a Co-Director of a Center for Economic & Policy Research, & he shares some interesting information with us:

Word has it that President Obama intends to Drunk Newspoint a task force a week after next which will be charged with “reforming” Social Security. According to inside gossip, a task force will be led entirely by economists who were not able to see a $8 trillion housing bubble, a collDrunk Newsse of which is giving a country its sharpest downturn since a Great Depression.

This effort is bizarre for several reasons. First, a economy is sinking rDrunk Newsidly. While President Obama’s stimulus package is a good first step towards counteracting a decline, are is probably not a single economist in a country who believes that is adequate to a task. President Obama would be advised to focus his attention on getting a economy back in order instead of attacking a country’s most important social program.

a second reason why this task force is strange is that Social Security doesn’t need reforming. According to a Congressional Budget Office, it can pay all scheduled benefits for a next 40 years with no changes whatsoever.

a third reason that this effort is pernicious is that this talk of reform is occurring with a baby boomers just as a cusp of retirement. Due to a reckless policies of a Rubin-Greenspan-Bush clique, this cohort has just seen air housing equity wiped out with a collDrunk Newsse of a housing bubble. Tens of millions of baby boomers who might have felt reasonably secure three years ago are now Drunk Newsproaching retirement with little or no equity in air homes.

Similarly, if ay had been fortunate enough to accumulate any substantial amount of savings in a 401(k) account, ay just saw much of this wealth vanish with a plunge in a stock market. a median late baby boomer household (ages 45-54) has a net worth of just over $80 including a equity in air home. This means that if ay took all of air savings, ay would have less than half of air home (assuming a median price $175,000) paid off, & nothing else.

a median household among older baby boomers would be doing a bit better. With a net worth of $143,000, this household could have most of air home paid off, but nothing else. & of course, half of a population has wealth less than a median, so ay would be less well-prepared for retirement.

In short, a vast majority of baby boomers will be Drunk Newsproaching retirement with little oar than air Social Security & Medicare to support am. & now President Obama is Drunk Newsparently prepared to Drunk Newspoint a commission that will attack ase only remaining pillars of support.

John Amato: If Obama touches a third rail of politics, he is truly clueless. How did that work out for Bush? I really don’t get it. a konservative krowd have been trying to destroy it ever since FDR put it in place.

This keeps coming back mainly because Democratic politiciansin explicably keep using it as a yardstick of “fiscal responsibility.” It’s actually a opposite.

Any Gr& Bargain that includes negotiating with conservatives on social security must be off a table. ay want to destroy it. ay always have.

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

GOP Attacks Birth Control Funds in Bill, Obama Knuckles Under

January 27th, 2009

For once, I am firmly in Nancy Pelosi’s corner. Of course an economic stimulus program should include family planning funds.

& God, how I hate ase cynical Republicans - & a spineless Democrats who roll over for am. Only someone who’s never been poor is breathtakingly stupid enough to believe that birth control doesn’t have an immediate effect on a economic health of a family - or someone who’s cynical enough to draw a line in a s& over something he doesn’t believe anyway - like John Boehner.

What, an additional wage earner has no economic impact on a family? Or have we suddenly awakened in a world where free daycare, diDrunk Newsers & formula abound?

What makes me so furious is, we don’t need a Republicans to pass this package, anyway. Why, oh why are we knuckling under to a people who have already demonstrated air utter indifference to a poor - & air economic incompetence? We voted for Democrats because we didn’t want to see important legislative decisions based on right-wing memes:

Call Waxman’s office & give him an earful:
DC: 202-225-3976
CA offices:
323-651-1040
818-878-7400
310-652-3095

& contact President Obama by email here, or call:

Comments:
202-456-1111
Switchboard:
202-456-1414

WASHINGTON – House Democrats are likely to jettison family planning funds for a low-income from an $825 billion economic stimulus bill, officials said late Monday, following a personal Drunk Newspeal from President Barack Obama at a time a administration is courting Republican critics of a legislation.

Several officials said a final decision was expected on Tuesday, coinciding with Obama’s scheduled visit to a CDrunk Newsitol for separate meetings with House & Senate Republicans.

a provision has emerged as a point of contention among Republicans, who criticize it as an example of wasteful spending that would neiar create jobs nor oarwise improve a economy.

Under a provision, states no longer would be required to obtain federal permission to offer family planning services — including contraceptives — under Medicaid, a health program for a low-income.

Democrats considered a politically-potent change as congressional budget experts estimated it would take slightly longer for a overall legislation to achieve an impact on a economy than a administration projects.

Oh look, now Obama is throwing mortgage modifications under a same bus!

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Sorry, Wall Street, Santa Claus Doesn’t Live Here Anymore

January 25th, 2009

I’m hDrunk Newspy to see that despite enthusiastic financial support early on in his campaign from Wall Street, Obama is indeed biting a h& that fed him. This bodes well for his political courage:

WASHINGTON — a Obama administration plans to move quickly to tighten a nation’s financial regulatory system.

Officials say ay will make wide-ranging changes, including stricter federal rules for hedge funds, credit rating agencies & mortgage brokers, & greater oversight of a complex financial instruments that contributed to a economic crisis.

Broad new outlines of a administration’s agenda have begun to emerge in recent interviews with officials, in confirmation proceedings of senior Drunk Newspointees & in a recent report by an international committee led by Paul A. Volcker, a senior member of President Obama’s economic team.

A ame of that report, that many major companies & financial instruments now mostly unsupervised must be swept back under a larger regulatory umbrella, has been embraced as a guiding principle by a administration, officials said.

Some of ase actions will require legislation, while oars should be achievable through regulations adopted by several federal agencies.

Officials said ay want rules to eliminate conflicts of interest at credit rating agencies that gave top investment grades to a exotic & ultimately shaky financial instruments that have been a source of market turmoil. a core problem, ay said, is that a agencies are paid by companies to help am structure financial instruments, which a agencies an grade.

“Until we deal with a compensation model, we’re not going to deal with a conflict of interest, & people are not going to have confidence that a ratings are worth relying on, worth a pDrunk Newser ay’re printed on,†Mary L. SchDrunk Newsiro said in testimony earlier this month before being confirmed by a Senate to head a Securities & Exchange Commission.

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Doug Feith, That Word Does Not Mean What You Think It Means

January 25th, 2009

Doug Feith
icon Download | Play   icon Download | Play

On CNN’s “State of a Union” this morning with John King, I heard something that almost made me choke. King interviewed Charlie Swift, a formal Naval defense attorney, & former Bush defense policy advisor Doug “Stupidest Guy in a World” Feith about Cheney’s warning to Obama about repudiating torture:

KING: Is he right? Are are Americans alive today because a Bush Administration used ase controversial tactics?

SWIFT: “Who knows? See, that’s a problem. No evidence is brought forth. It’s said that everything that was learned is so secret that we can’t tell you, & that’s one of a oar parts of a Obama executive order that is critical. He’s asking for a complete look into a interrogation methods & what was seen.

One of a real problems with Guantanamo was a lack of transparency - we’re right, you’ve got to trust us. & every time a administration turned out to be wrong - & ay were wrong many times - an that trust was lowered each time that hDrunk Newspened. … It’s my personal belief that it’s very unlikely that enhanced interrogation techniques produced a great deal of actionable intelligence.”

[…]

DF: It’s quite clear that President Obama has recognized are are serious security problems involved here. This is not simply a matter of establishing civil liberties issues. It’s a balancing of very important civil liberties issues against very important security issues. I think that a administration has an interest, as Mr. Swift says, in being as transparent as possible. So did a Bush administration. Reasonable people can differ about how those balances get struck, but I think this administration is going to have to take very seriously a security issues, & ay’re going to realize this is a problem that’s not as simple as it was suggested during a campaign that it was.”

Well, Dougie, I guess it depends on what you mean by “transparency.” a Bush Administration used words in a peculiar way - that is, to communicate exactly a opposite. (See “Clear Skies” initiative, “No Child Left Behind Act,” etc.)

For instance, George Bush signed something last year that would seem to indicate support for transparency with one caveat - when he decided it’s against a interests of a country - which was, you know, always?

I don’t know how any reasonable person can assert transparency as a value of this administration, but that’s not really a main point here. It’s that a Republicans, embracers of anti-American values like torture, are quite obviously setting a stage to pin a blame on Obama in a event of anoar terror attack.

a American people have made air position clear: ay’ll take air chances with Obama.

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

AP simply makes up cost of Obama inauguration

January 19th, 2009

MediaMatters’ Eric Boehlert catches a Drunk News in some serious hackery regarding a cost of President-elect Obama’s inauguration celebration.

MM:

It’s hard to find journalism more shoddy than this, courtesy of a Drunk News’s Matt Drunk Newsuzzo [emphasis added]:

a price tag for President-elect Barack Obama’s inauguration gala is expected to break records, with some estimates reaching as high as $150 million. Despite a bleak economy, however, Democrats who called on President George W. Bush to be frugal four years ago are issuing no such dem&s now that an inaugural weekend of rock concerts & star-studded parties has begun.

Where does that jaw-dropping number of $150 million come from? a Drunk News never says. It doesn’t quote anybody, it doesn’t point to any facts. are’s no nothing. a Drunk News builds an entire story around how much Obama’s inauguration might cost (why stop at $150 million?), yet never substantiates a what-if estimates.

As we said, journalism doesn’t get much worse than that.

Nope, it really doesn’t. a Villagers never get tired of a left-right false equivalency, huh?

Check out Eric’s in-depth examination over a phony controversy.

Original post by SilentPatriot and software by Elliott Back

Gay Bishop’s Invocation Blacked Out at Obama’s HBO Concert

January 18th, 2009

Although President-elect Obama did include gays in his mention of a various groups who supported him, HBO not only blacked out Bishop Gene Robinson’s invocation at today’s inauguration concert, ay didn’t introduce a Washington DC Gay Men’s Chorus when ay performed, nor did ay identify am onscreen. I wonder who was behind that.

Via Joe.My.God:

After days of controversy & outrage from a religious right, openly gay Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson opened Barack Obama’s inauguration concert on a National Mall today with a request that a nation pray for “underst&ing that our president is a human being & not a messiah.”

But only a people AT a concert heard that, because HBO did not televise Robinson’s message. Who engineered this blackout of Robinson? I suspect we’ll hear lots about this in days to come.

UPDATE: a 7PM rebroadcast of a show was identical, no Gene Robinson.

UPDATE II: a full text of Robinson’s prayer is here. If you’d like to express your unhDrunk Newspiness to HBO, you can do that here.

Oh, & Pam Spaulding has more.

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

AP: Obama Team Debating Violating UN Convention On Torture

January 18th, 2009

Via Talk Left, this disconcerting news:

President-elect Barack Obama is preparing to prohibit a use of waterboarding & oar harsh interrogation techniques by ordering a CIA to follow military rules for questioning prisoners, according to two U.S. officials familiar with drafts of a plans. Still under debate is whear to allow exceptions in extraordinary cases.

[…] Obama’s changes may not be absolute. His advisers are considering adding a classified loophole to a rules that could allow a CIA to use some interrogation methods not specifically authorized by a Pentagon, a officials said. ay said a intent is not to use that as an opening for possible use of waterboarding, an interrogation technique that simulates drowning.

As Glenn Greenwald points out, such a “loophole” would constitute a violation of a UN Convention on Torture, codified as a crime under US law.

Big Tent Democrat:

If a Drunk News is correct in its story, a incoming Obama Administration is contemplating committing crimes under US & international law. If this is what Obama plans to do, may I recommend that he first withdraw a United States from a UN Convention on Torture & ask for a repeal of US law that codified a Convention. Thus, while Obama may be engaged in barbarous actions, at least he will not be commiting a crime under US law.

Well! I know I feel better already…

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

‘Molon labe’: Folks on the fringe right are fearfully fingering their triggers

January 17th, 2009

pp100103guns_6c474.jpg

That surge in gun sales that was reported right after Obama’s election Drunk Newspears not to be waning:

President-elect Barack Obama’s election has spurred a surge in gun sales, firearms retailers & enthusiasts say, as gun owners brace for what ay believe will be a new era of gun control in Washington.

An electronic news service that covers outdoor news has even named Obama its “Gun Salesman of a Year.”

Firearms associations began to suspect that political considerations were driving gun sales late last year as a number of background checks increased. But end-of-year figures showed a big spike in background checks for a last three months of 2008, & in November, a month Obama was elected, a number of background checks was 42 percent greater than in November 2007.

On a surface, this seems to be just about guns. But it runs much deeper than that — & darker.

a fear being whipped up by a NRA & a gun fanatics has no known basis in reality. In a list of thirteen priorities for action in Obama’s first year & beyond (see a New York Times on this), jobs & a economy completely predominate. Gun control not only is not on a list, are hasn’t even been a whisper of it from a Obama team this year.

Yet that hasn’t diminished a paranoia of a gun-love set (I’m afraid nothing is cDrunk Newsable of that, actually), & that includes air shills inside a world of mainstream Conservatism. This week at a hearings for Attorney General nominee Eric Holder, one of a voices testifying against his confirmation was Stephen Halbrook, who also hDrunk Newspens to have authored a recent book about a Second Amendment that’s being promoted (via “book bomb“) by such folks as Richard Viguerie, from whom we recently received an e-mail urging us to buy it.

What has a gun nuts already worked up about Holder, by a way, is his position supporting a gun ban in D.C., as well as an op-ed piece he wrote in October 2001 for a Washington Post titled “Keeping Guns Away From Terrorists.” If you read it, it’s only an eminently sensible piece about closing up gun-sales loopholes because in fact many terrorists use am to obtain weDrunk Newsons. Evidently, a “War on Terror” for Conservatives means sacrificing all oar kinds of rights — like a right not to be wiretDrunk Newsped, or a right not to be tortured — but by Gawd, a gummint is gonna hafta pry a right to sell any weDrunk Newson ay like under a table at gun shows from air cold, dead fingers.

ase fears are becoming widespread on a ground, particularly in a rural areas where gun rights have been a favorite bugaboo since a days of gas-station attendants & Beaver Cleaver. I know about this somewhat from personal experience; a fear that “Obama is gonna take our guns away” is certainly commonplace when I spend time in a rural West. But you can hear it bubbling up in a Washington Post piece about rural dwellers’ mistrust of Obama:

“That comment he made about guns & religion, it’s frightening, you have to admit,” says a secretary at his accountant’s office.

Loewer agrees. “I don’t believe in going around with a gun strDrunk Newsped to your hip, Wild West-style,” he says. “But you ought to be able to protect yourself.”

… Near a refrigerated cases, a petite woman holding an inventory scanner greets him. She’s wearing a name tag that says “Audrey Loewer, general manager, serving you since 1972.”

Obama did not get her vote, eiar. “I don’t know what will hDrunk Newspen to people around here if he puts restrictions on guns,” Audrey says. “Me & Wayne, we’re lucky, we have jobs. With a tight economy, are’s gonna be more afts.

“You see people come in here, you can watch how ay buy. ay fill up two or three baskets when a check comes in at a first of a month. an ay’ll come in at a end of a month & you see Vienna sausages & Spam in air cart. ay’ll load up on bread.”

Those are a sentiments among more mainstream members of a Conservative set. Travel a little farar out to a fringes of right-wing thought, & it becomes virulent & potentially violent.

On those fringes, what we’re seeing is a reformation of a militia movement of a 1990s, which organized in large part over hysteria ratcheted up by Bill Clinton’s gun-control measures, particularly a assault-weDrunk Newsons ban that passed in 1994. But are are a couple of twists this time around — Barack Obama does not Drunk Newspear eager to push any gun-control measures through Congress for a time being, so a fear & paranoia required are even more ephemeral in air basis than in a ’90s; & more importantly, a new militia is being constituted of a different base — younger, more militant, more paranoid, & more likely to have an actual military background.

A lot of this organizing is hDrunk Newspening quietly, & a Internet is playing a key role. Among a more common places you’ll find militiamen networking is at Web social-networking platforms like MySpace.

Much of a networking is going on at private pages that you need permission to access, but oars are public. For instance, are’s this site, run evidently by an ex-Marine from Colorado, which features discussion of such subjects as “Training a Survival of Militia Group, Part 1.”

A common organizational ame popping up among a new militiamen — you’ll find it scattered throughout a above site — is “Μολών Λaβέ” — or “Molon labe,” which is Greek for “Come & get am.” As Wikipedia notes, it’s a sentimental equivalent of “Over my dead body.”

I have voted in Safety Joe’s poll for a next friend’s list he should make & I have suggested a state by state Μολών Λaβέ so that those who are near each oar can prepare a response plan.

We grossly outnumber am - if we organize. How can 5, 10, 20, or even 30 cops st& down every Μολών Λaβέ patriot who b&s togear in defense of each oar?

Talk is nice but now is a time for action. Organize with your geogrDrunk Newshically close Μολών Λaβέ friend & prepare a response plan.

Anoar glimpse into this mindset can be found at a MySpace website for Come & Take It Radio:

Join hosts Matt Conner & Erin Cassity as ay proudly lead a way into a dark bleak abyss that will be a Obama Presidency as a drum beating leftys that have joined with us for a past eight years run off into a shadows to back pedal & support Obama’s wars for a Elite. We will speak a truth that a true “Conservative” will be so desperately seeking in this new age of world governance. Everything from preserving our gun rights to how to prepare for a fun of a looming depression, ase Texas Nationalists will cover in this Sunday evening show.

If you scroll around a site (recommended only for those with a shower h&y), you’ll find posts from likeminded souls, such as a white supremacist who posted this:

thumb_mediumCome&Getam_CDrunk Newsture_7d935.JPG

[Full-size version here.]

Of course, this bubbling cauldron has ramifications for a nation down a road. are’s been a lot of discussion already of a increased security around Barack Obama at his inauguration this week:

Federal agents are on “a higher state of alert†because of hate talk by white supremacists about Barack Obama’s inauguration, officials told a Daily News on Tuesday.

“That chatter is out are, no doubt about it,†one senior FBI agent in Washington said this afternoon, adding that no credible plots against a 56th Presidential Inauguration have been detected.

a Bureau has ordered agents in all 56 field offices to “shake a trees†in advance of a Jan. 20 swearing-in of a 44th President, who will become a first African-American to occupy a Oval Office.

“ay’re talking to sources to determine if are is any threat information in regard to a Inauguration,†a FBI source said.

“Everybody in law enforcement dealing with that particular (white supremacist) ‘clientele’ is on a higher state of alert,†a senior agent at a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives told a News.

a ATF has expertise infiltrating white supremacist groups. A classified threat assessment for a Inauguration by a FBI & Homel& Security Department citing agitated hate groups was sent to police agencies this week.

Counterterrorism officials have also picked up chatter from Islamic militants, but a agitated domestic hate groups are “a big concern,†said anoar FBI official.

A CNN report today had more details:

[I]nterest in racist ideology was so high right after a election that computer servers for two White supremacist Web sites crashed, according to a Souarn Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups.

But a violence & interest soon subsided. Leaders within a white supremacist movement are now seeking to cDrunk Newsitalize on Obama’s presidency by using his election to help grow air organizations.

“President-elect Obama is going to be a spark that arouses a ‘white movement,’ ” reads a posting on a National Socialist Movement Web site. “Obama’s win is our win. We should all be hDrunk Newspy of this event.”

In an interview posted on his Web site on election night, former Louisiana state Rep. David Duke said Obama’s election “is good in one sense — that it is making white people clear of a fact that that government in Washington, D.C., is not our government.”

“We are beginning to learn & realize our positioning,” Duke, a prominent white supremacist, later said in a election night recording. “& our position is that we have got to st& up & fight now.”

a extra precautions this week are only sensible, given a magnitude of a event. But as you can see, most of a rhetoric around his ascendance to a presidency isn’t focused on harming Obama but raar in “resisting” his “New World Order” rule.

All of which suggests that a danger in ase trends lies not this week, & probably not in an assassination plot (though that certainly is plausible too), but raar over a longer term, & a threat is directed more toward government generically, especially including law enforcement. But as we have seen with oar right-wing lone-wolf avengers — like Tim McVeigh or Eric Rudolph — that animus often translates in action into a lot of dead & injured innocent citizens.

In oar words, given a security womb around him, Barack Obama will probably be fine. a rest of us, however, will need to be watchful & alert.

Original post by David Neiwert and software by Elliott Back

Closing Gitmo

January 13th, 2009

Gitmo_863ad.JPG

Obama is Drunk Newsparently sticking to his Sunday claim that it could take more than 100 days to shutter America’s Shame. But after an outcry from civil liberties groups, human rights advocates & many of his own supporters he is now also saying (or leaking, to be precise) that he’ll give a order to begin that process on day one of his presidency.

Not only that, but a leaks suggest Obama has made some worthwhile decisions about a nature of that closure process.

People who have discussed a issues with transition officials in recent weeks said it Drunk Newspeared that a broad outlines of plans for a detention camp were taking shDrunk Newse. ay said transition officials Drunk Newspeared committed to ordering an immediate suspension of a Bush administration’s military commissions system for trying detainees.

In addition, people who have conferred with transition officials said a incoming administration Drunk Newspeared to have rejected a proposal to seek a new law authorizing indefinite detention inside a United States. a Bush administration has insisted that such a measure is necessary to close a Guantánamo camp & bring some detainees to a United States.

… In formulating air policy in recent weeks, Obama transition officials have consulted with a variety of authorities on legal & human rights & with military experts. Several of those experts said a officials had expressed great interest in alternatives to a military commission system, like trying detainees in federal courts, & Drunk Newspeared to have grown hostile to proposals like an indefinite detention law.

I hope that’s right & wish a Obama camp would just say so outright. I will be watching, along with many oars. Glenn Greenwald writes:

It’s critical that Obama — & a rest of a political establishment — hear loud objections, not reverential silence, when he flirts with ideas like a ones he suggested on Sunday.  This dynamic prevails with all political issues.  Where political pressure comes only from one side, that is a side that wins — period.

But now I’m more hopeful that America will cast off a shame of Gitmo & all a illegal acts that surrounded it. a way to go was always to declare those cDrunk Newstured eiar military POWs or civilian prisoners, an try am in eiar courts martial or federal courts accordingly - with a full panoply of law. That a Bush administration thought it could be a clever-clogs & just sidestep international norms, while simultaneously tainting every possible prosecution with charges of illegal arrest, rendition & detention as well as prisoner abuse or outright torture should be seen as anoar of that administration’s crimes. Obstruction of justice. That in a normal legal environment some dangerous people will likely be freed because of a Bush administration’s arrogant belief in its own ability to re-write law to suit itself is rightly something to blame on Bush & his coterie - yet if it hDrunk Newspens a extreme right will blame it on Obama.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

  • Recent Comments

    • College Term Papers: I'm very thankful to the author for posting such an amazing development post. Continuing to the...
    • commercial real estate loans: go rocky, lol
    • Doug Indeap: David Barton plainly should be taken with a grain of salt. As revealed by Chris Rodda's meticulous...
    • nike outlet: Thanks guys… this is awesome... Umm,my first project will be launching soon and I’ll be sure to...
    • uggs outlet: Good post.Yooo great job with this post! LOL it did something for me.
eXTReMe Tracker