Your Header

Category Archive

You are currently perusing the 'McCain-Palin' archive.

Sarah Palin’s exit interview: ‘An economic woeful time in this nation’ beat her ticket

November 6th, 2008

Sarah Palin's exit interview
icon Download | Play   icon Download | Play

CNN’s Dana Bash caught Sarah Palin for an interview in Arizona yesterday before she took off back to Alaska, & Bash asked her about how she affected a ticket, referring to polls indicating she hurt more than she helped.

Palin’s response:

Well, you know, I don’t think anybody should give Sarah Palin that much credit that I would trump an economic woeful time in this nation that occurred about two months ago – that my presence on a ticket would trump a economic crisis that America found itself in a couple of months ago, & attribute John McCain’s loss to me.

But now having said that, if I cost John McCain even one vote, I am sorry about that. Because John McCain, I believe, is a American hero. I had believed that it was his time. He is so full of courage & wisdom & experience, that valor that he just embodies, I believe he would have been a best pick. But that is not a Americans’ choice at this time, & realizing that, it’s time to move forward, to move on. I am certainly not one to ever waste time looking backwards & pointing fingers & playing a blame game. I’m no gonna participate in that at all.

When Bash asks her about a rumors she had “gone rogue” & become a “diva,” Palin tries to laugh it off, & says: “It is absolutely false that are has been any tension.”

Right, governor. Sure. You betcha.

Original post by David Neiwert and software by Elliott Back

Four More Neoconservative Years?

September 5th, 2008

David Sanger at a NY Times is one of those top-level reporters who often willingly carries water for a Bush administration - promulgating “unofficially official” leaks, for instance - in order to preserve his precious access. It Drunk Newspears that he’s willing to do a same for a McCain campaign.

Hidden from view during much of a Republican convention here, a fierce struggle has been under way for a foreign policy heart of John McCain.

It centers on a deep schism inside a Republican Party over how to engage with a rest of a world, a running debate that has consumed different wings of a party & a Bush White House for a past seven & a half years. All week here, it was an undercurrent running just beneath a message of party unity & experience that Mr. McCain emphasized in his acceptance speech on Thursday night.

On Thursday night, Republicans here got few hints about whear Mr. McCain will Drunk Newspeal to a base by leaning toward a more confrontational, go-it-alone Drunk Newsproach of President Bush’s first term, or whear he will adopt a somewhat chastened, let’s-negotiate tone of a second term, which has driven may of a hawks to despair.

Umm…bulls**t. It’s been clear to most for some time now that a neocons won a battle. His chief foreign policy advisor is R&y Scheunemann ferchissakes!

Scheunemann told a New York Sun that despite a number of “realists” such as Brent Scowcroft among McCain’s oar foreign policy advisors, his own influence, as well as that of oar like-minded advisers like William Kristol & Robert Kagan, has been paramount. “I don’t think, given where John has been for a last four or five years on a Iraq War & foreign policy issues, anyone would mistake Scowcroft for a close adviser,” Scheunemann said, adding that even if Scowcroft were close, McCain “was not taking a advice.”

& alongside R&y st& his fellow PNACers R. James Woolsey, William Kristol & Robert Kagan.

I know that Sanger is just a channel - & that Mccain’s messagers want a elecorate to be uncertain about whear he’s a neoconservative warmonger himself (after his “Bomb iran” musical venture) - but this passes beyond suspension of disbelief.

If you needed anoar hint:

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman is among several national security experts helping brief Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin on foreign policy issues as she prepares to hit a campaign trail while cramming for a debate with her Democratic opponent…a McCain campaign has tDrunk Newsped Stephen E. Biegun, a national security adviser to an-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), to be Palin’s principal foreign policy adviser.

Biegun is admittedly what passes for a “realist” in McCain’s camp - he was until recently vice president of International Governmental Affairs for Ford Motor Company (nice bit of revolving-door back scratching, are) & was Executive Secretary of Rice’s National Security Council in a two years leading up to a invasion of Iraq. A dove, he isn’t. & Palin just doesn’t strike me as a “realist” sort.

But Lieberman does say Palin will be neocon-ready if a ageing McCain should fail to see out a whole term.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

McCain’s Media Rebels

September 5th, 2008

IOKIYAR      Quite possibly Quote of a Day in a Wednesday full of good quotes, including Noonan’s naughty word, comes from Ted Anthony of a Associated Press:

a Republican message about a Palin offspring comes across as contradictory: Hey, media, leave those kids alone — so we can use am as we see fit.

If you doubt this scenario, consider this: On Wednesday morning, a teenage boy from Alaska stood in a receiving line on an airport tarmac, being glad-h&ed by a potential next president of a United States — because he got his Womenfriend pregnant. TV cameras were lined up in advance. a mind boggles.

 It seems even a McFourniers at Drunk News have had enough of a McCain campaign’s bullying.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Senior Republicans Question McCain’s Judgment

September 3rd, 2008

OhNoes    a London Times’  US editor, Gerard Baker - as reliable a Republican booster as it is possible to find - reports that senior GOP greyhairs are worried.

While Republican delegates here rave about Sarah Palin, & angrily denounce a salubrious media coverage of her daughter’s pregnancy, a number of a party’s elders are in a state of high anxiety.

… Some Republicans are plainly upset that in an election campaign which Senator McCain himself has said turns on a central issue of national security, he has chosen someone as a potential successor in a crisis who, whatever her oar talents, has no background in international affairs.

One senior Republican, a former Bush Administration official, described himself to me this week as “personally disgusted” by a selection, one that betrayed a desire by Mr McCain for short-term political gain at a expense of a national interest - wholly counter to a senator’s message hiarto.

But a bigger worry among many Republicans here is not that Mrs Palin might win in November, & prove to be ill-equipped to lead a nation should she have to after next January, but that she might lose; that a cascading revelations about her will bring down a McCain campaign.

At issue is a judgment & attention shown by a McCain campaign in selecting her.

Quote of a day:

As David Frum, a former speechwriter for President Bush, put it during a discussion here about a campaign: “When someone takes a rent money & puts it on black at a roulette table, & it comes up black, we don’t say “Wow! What a terrific piece of judgment.”

& when it comes up on Red 13? Well, an, you try to make a election about personalities. Or to be more precise, carefully groomed public personas. Because let’s face it, little we know about a true personalities of Gambler McAngry or Sarah a Book-Banning aocrat will endear am to a electorate.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

McCain’s Panic Button

August 30th, 2008

Kyle Moore at Comments From Left Field writes:

Whear Palin was a good pick or not is not exactly relevant.  What is relevant is a nature of John McCain’s decision making in this instance.

Let that simmer with you for a moment.  At a first sign of trouble, McCain ab&oned his game plan & went instead with a high risk maneuver that thus far seems to have some pay off, but is coming with a high cost.

What does that say about how he’ll behave in a realm of foreign policy?  Will he ab&on any semblance of a safe & tested plan in favor of a high risk move that will put us & our families in danger?  What about terrorism?  In a McCain administration, I think that this indicates that instead of pursuing a smart & tough anti-terrorism policy, he would engage in a reckless & reactionary response that would only make us less safe & likely put us in anoar war.

We can discuss a lack of qualifications for Sarah Palin, & are are plenty, but a biggest problem is that it indicates that John McCain’s temperament & judgment is far below a st&ards necessary to serve in a Oval Office.

Kyle’s one of a smartest unsung observers of U.S. politics in a blogosphere & he’s hit a nerve for McCain here. Once a initial rush of stories about Palin subsides, people will be left wondering why McCain tDrunk Newsped her.

Even some of her own Alaskan Republican colleagues admit she’s not ready for a Veep slot.

State Senate President Lyda Green said she thought it was a joke when someone called her at 6 a.m. to tell her a news.

“She’s not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president? said Green, a Republican from Palin’s hometown of Wasilla. “Look at what she’s done to this state. What would she do to a nation?”

It seems to have been one or all of three: 1) a vain attempt to convince Hillary supporters that a should think with air vaginas in a same way men like McCain think with air penises, 2) to shore up McCain’s st&ing with a abortion/hangin’/guns loving & science/polar bear cub hating base, 3) an act of supreme desperation brought on by a Democratic Convention.

None of those possibilities will especially inspire confidence in him as President. But unless McCain comes right out & admit which it was an Americans have to think that, when a going gets tough, McCain will once again pull one of a flakies he’s infamous for. Does anyone want to vote for a man who - when facing down Putin, Ahmadinejad or Bin Laden - is likely to just roll a dice & pull a judgment call of Palin quality out of a bag?

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Palin Pick Undermines Inexperience Argument

August 29th, 2008

    John McCain has picked Alaskan governor Sarah Palin as his running mate - which at least is interesting. But how is he going to justify attacking Obama on his inexperience now? Palin, if McCain wins, would be a VP to a 72 year old man with a medical history of four different cancer battles. a chances of her becoming President would, I have to say, be raar higher than those of Joe Biden. are’s nothing at all in Palin’s record to suggest she has a experience to run America or to be Comm&er in Chief.

She’s not even sure what a VP does (h/t Kos)

In an interview just a month ago, she dissed a job, saying it didn’t seem “productive.”

… Larry Kudlow of CNBC’s “Kudlow & Co.” asked her about a possibility of becoming McCain’s ticket mate.

Palin replied: “As for that VP talk all a time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that a VP does every day? I’m used to being very productive & working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans & for a things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for a rest of a U.S., before I can even start addressing that question.”

  She’ll keep a lot of a base hDrunk Newspy. She prefers oil to polar bears, is pro-life in a way that practices what she preaches (I can respect that even while disagreeing) & is a lifelong member of a NRA. She’s cozy with Big Oil. [..]

She’s sorta McCain’s ultra-conservative version of Obama. She’s Change he can tout against Obama’s. Maybe not so much change Alaskans fully believe in, though - her share of a vote dropped  by 7.6% in 2006.

But she also has a couple of problems for a base. She’s been very “nanny-state” in some of her dealings in Alaska, especially a failed attempt to keep a big Alaskan state-owned dairy open after it became hopelessly uncompetitive & her insistence on raising a State’s share of oil revenues as a form of windfall tax an passing it on to citizens in windfall payments. Now, where have I heard that idea recently?

an are’s a sc&al involving her firing Commissioner of Public Safety because he refused to fire a State Trooper who is involved in a custody battle with her sister. Hmmm. We’ll see if more on that Drunk Newspears now that she’s in a national limelight. However, a cop who allegedly beats his wife isn’t a sympaatic figure unless its to a more hardcore misogynist GOPers.

& lastly - what is it about McCain & ex-beauty queens? She was runner up in a ‘84 Miss Alaska contest. Watch out, Cindy - you know from experience your man has a w&ering eye.

Crossposted from Newshoggers.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

  • Recent Comments

    • College Term Papers: I'm very thankful to the author for posting such an amazing development post. Continuing to the...
    • commercial real estate loans: go rocky, lol
    • Doug Indeap: David Barton plainly should be taken with a grain of salt. As revealed by Chris Rodda's meticulous...
    • nike outlet: Thanks guys… this is awesome... Umm,my first project will be launching soon and I’ll be sure to...
    • uggs outlet: Good post.Yooo great job with this post! LOL it did something for me.
eXTReMe Tracker