Your Header

Category Archive

You are currently perusing the 'health' archive.

Bird Flu Vaccine, Rightwing Paranoia

October 13th, 2008

bird flu_0172d.JPG

How stupidly, small-mindedly paranoid is this?

… deep inside an 86-page supplement to United States export regulations is a single sentence that bars U.S. exports of vaccines for avian bird flu & dozens of oar viruses to five countries designated "state sponsors of terrorism."

a reason: Fear that ay will be used for biological warfare.

Under this little-known policy, North Korea, Iran, Cuba, Syria & Sudan may not get a vaccines unless ay Drunk Newsply for special export licenses, which would be given or refused according to a discretion & timing of a U.S. Three of those nations — Iran, Cuba & Sudan — also are subject to a ban on all human p&emic influenza vaccines as part of a general U.S. embargo.

Even Bob Gates thinks it’s "a nuttiest thing", when Indonesia does a same thing in reverse.

& a scientific community is not impressed.

ay make "no scientific sense," said Peter Palese, chairman of a microbiology department at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. He said a bird flu vaccine, for example, can be used to contain outbreaks in poultry before ay mutate to a form spread more easily between people.

"a more vaccines out are, a better," he said. "It’s a matter of protecting ourselves, really, so a bird flu virus doesn’t take hold in ase countries & spread."

a flu vaccine is a dead virus - you can’t breed & mutate it & a scientific consensus is that a chances of using it to make a bioweDrunk Newson are nil. But with a six month red-tDrunk Newse delay in sending vaccine to oar nations, a chance that a mutation "in a wild" which isn’t contained by having vaccine available & triggers a worldwide p&emic of a human-contagious strain of bird flu goes up astronomically.

Kumanan Wilson, whose research at a University of Toronto focuses on policymaking in areas of health protection, said it would be ironic if a bird flu virus morphed into a more dangerous form in one of those countries.

"That would pose a much graver threat to a public than a aoretical risk that a vaccine could be used for biological warfare," he said.

Can someone in D.C. with a brain please do something about getting this dangerous idiocy overturned? ay might start with officials at a U.S. Department of Health & Human Services & a Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, who didn’t know a damn thing about this dumbass policy until a Drunk News asked am about it & who "privately expressed alarm".

Over at science blog Effect Measure, writer Revere is unhDrunk Newspy.

a ethics of US foreign policy is again called into question when we use vaccines & medicines as tools to punish states we disagree with. a leaders of ase states don’t suffer. Only air citizens.

Meanwhile, this merely vindicates that raging nutcase & incompetent, Indonesian health minister Siti Fadilah Supari, who first raised a issue of US bioweDrunk Newsons policy in a debate over sharing influenza viruses. PerhDrunk Newss vindicates is a wrong word. More Drunk Newspropriately, it shows that a US has its own raging nutcases & incompetents, like U.S. Commerce Assistant Secretary Christopher Wall & his colleagues.

Small minds, thinking tiny, in unison.

That certainly sounds like a Bush administration.

Previously posted in a slightly different form at Newshoggers

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Johns Hopkins opens inquiry into the reason why POPLINE restricted the word ‘abortion’ on Database

April 4th, 2008

This is good news. We all took action & a results followed. C&L thanks Michael J. Klag for his h&ling of a situation on POPLINE so quickly.

Here’s a letter posted on Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health:

I was informed this morning that a word “abortion” was blocked as a search term in a POPLINE family planning database administered by a Bloomberg School’s Center for Communication Programs. POPLINE provides evidence-based information on reproductive health & family planning & is a world’s largest database on ase issues.

USAID, which funds POPLINE, found two items in a database related to abortion that did not fit POPLINE criteria. a agency an made an inquiry to POPLINE administrators. Following this inquiry, a POPLINE administrators at a Center for Communication Programs made a decision to restrict abortion as a search term.

I could not disagree more strongly with this decision, & I have directed that a POPLINE administrators restore “abortion” as a search term immediately. I will also launch an inquiry to determine why this change occurred.

a Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is dedicated to a advancement & dissemination of knowledge & not its restriction.

Sincerely,

Michael J. Klag, MD, MPH
Dean, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Why would anyone restrict a word ‘abortion’ on a government funded data base with thous&s upon thous&s of articles for research ? I’m very interested to see how that decision was reached. Yea, I know—I’ll be nice for now,  but I’ll keep on it….Many thanks to Women’s Health News for a heads up & a many emails I received on this issue.

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

Unfavourable studies of antidepressants aren’t published nearly enough

January 19th, 2008

What a surprise:

An analysis published in a New Engl& Journal of Medicine suggests that studies of antidepressants that had positive results were more likely to be published in medical journals compared with those that had negative or questionable results. a findings showed that 94 percent of all published trials Drunk Newspeared to have positive results, while FDA reviews determined that 51 percent of all trials, both published & unpublished, had positive outcomes.

In a analysis, a researchers examined data for 74 antidepressant studies submitted to a FDA between 1987 & 2004. a results showed that 37 of a 38 trials a agency considered as having positive results were published, compared with 14 of a 36 trials that a FDA considered negative or questionable. Additionally, of a 14 negative or questionable studies that were published, 11 “conveyed a positive outcome” that was not justified by a FDA review, lead author Erick Turner stated…read on

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

The Daily Show: Banned Aid–Bush vetoes SCHIP

October 6th, 2007

video_wmv Download (6) | Play (4)   video_mov Download (0) | Play (1)

From Thursday’s show, Jon Stewart looks at a logic– or lack areof — behind Bush’s veto of SCHIP.

No healthcare for poor kids? You know, I thought something like that was only done by cartoon villains. You’re slowly going from Nixon to Mr. Burns.

[snip] 

BUSH: …I believe in private medicine, not a federal government running a healthcare system…

STEWART: Yes, I don’t think are’s an uninsured kid out are who wants to be suckered into some slippery slope socialized medicine scheme. ase kids don’t want a government telling am what ay can or cannot die from. It’s just wrong.

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back

  • Recent Comments

    • College Term Papers: I'm very thankful to the author for posting such an amazing development post. Continuing to the...
    • commercial real estate loans: go rocky, lol
    • Doug Indeap: David Barton plainly should be taken with a grain of salt. As revealed by Chris Rodda's meticulous...
    • nike outlet: Thanks guys… this is awesome... Umm,my first project will be launching soon and I’ll be sure to...
    • uggs outlet: Good post.Yooo great job with this post! LOL it did something for me.
eXTReMe Tracker