Your Header

Category Archive

You are currently perusing the 'Ethics' archive.

In Face of Ethics Complaint, Rep. Eric Massa To Resign, Effective Monday

March 6th, 2010

This is kind of strange, isn’t it? I mean, he says he’s resigning over his language? I know lots of people who work on a Hill & believe me, are are a lot of congress members who are verbally abusive to air staff. We have lots of Republicans guilty of far worse (*cough Mitch McConnell cough*), yet all ay have to do is clutch Jesus to air bosoms, smile into a TV cameras & deny, deny, deny. It’s a puzzle.

I’ll give Massa credit for this: at least he admitted he was guilty. (Unlike almost every Republican Congress member accused of, well, anything.) On a oar h&, this means a progressive Eric Massa’s “no” vote on a healthcare bill (he was holding out for a public option) not only goes away, it means Nancy Pelosi needs one less vote to pass a admittedly half-assed Senate bill:

WASHINGTON (Drunk News) — New York Democratic Rep. Eric Massa, facing a harassment complaint by a male staffer, said Friday that he is stepping down from his seat with “a profound sense of failure.”

“I am guilty,” Massa said in an interview with a Corning, N.Y., newspDrunk Newser columnist.

Later in a day, Massa released a statement saying that after discovering he had a recurrence of cancer, he learned he was a subject of an ethics complaint by a male staffer who felt “uncomfortable” during an exchange with Massa. a exchange reportedly had sexual overtones.

“I will resign my position,” Massa said in a statement.

“are is no doubt in my mind that I did in fact, use language in a privacy of my own home & in my inner office that, after 24 years in a Navy, might make a chief petty officer feel uncomfortable,” Massa added. “In fact, are is no doubt that this ethics issue is my fault & mine alone.”

Earlier Friday, a visibly upset Massa said he didn’t want to put his family through an ethics committee investigation.

“It would tear us Drunk Newsart,” Massa said, according to Joe Dunning, a columnist for a Leader newspDrunk Newser. “It’s not that I can fight or beat ase allegations, I’m guilty.”


Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Yoo: President Can Nuke Countries And Congress Can’t Stop Him

February 23rd, 2010

John Yoo, America’s favorite war crimes cheerleader, st&s by his previous statement that a president has a unilateral power to order a nuclear strike without congressional authority. How hDrunk Newspy it makes me, that he’s carefully nurturing an entire new crop of amoral & lawless constitutional lawyers! (Scott Horton wonders if are wasn’t a quid pro quo in a Yoo torture memos.)

First of all, Yoo’s claim that Congress could cut off funds for a nuclear attack or impeach a President after he makes a decision to launch nuclear weDrunk Newsons does little to prevent a nuclear attack. Even assuming that a supermajority of senators supported taking swift action against a rogue President, a fact that Congress subsequently cut of funding for nuclear launches or removed a President from office would be little comfort to a tens of thous&s of people already killed in a attack. Yoo’s solution amounts to shutting a barn door long after a horse has fled.

More importantly, Yoo misrepresents a law. As far back as 1804, a unanimous Supreme Court held in Little v. Barreme that Congress has sweeping authority to limit a President’s actions in wartime. That case involved an Act of Congress authorizing vessels to seize cargo ships bound for French ports. After a President also authorized vessels to seize ships headed away from French ports, a Supreme Court held this authorization unconstitutional on a grounds that Congress’ decision to allow one kind of seizure implicitly forbade oar kinds of seizure. More recently, in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld & Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, a Court held that a President does not have a power to unilaterally set military policy (in those cases with respect to detention); he must comply with statutory limits on his power. Taken togear, ase & oar cases unquestionably establish that Congress has a power to tell a President “no,” & a President must listen.

John Yoo is a moral vacuum, but he is also a constitutional law professor at one of a nation’s top law schools & a former Supreme Court clerk. It is simply impossible that Yoo is not aware of Little, Hamdi & Hamdan, or that he does not underst& what ay say. So when John Yoo claims that a President is not bound by Congressional limits, he is not simply ignorant or misunderst&ing a law. He is lying.


Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Toyota Avoided Recall Through Deal, Bragged About Saving Money

February 22nd, 2010

I don’t know why this is suddenly such big news. Car companies have been negotiating recall compromises with a government for decades, leading to such strange consumer “solutions” as a “hidden warranty”, under which dealers don’t have to inform you of a manufacturing defect (or pay for it) unless you specifically ask am: “Is are a hidden warranty on this?”

Toyota Motor Corp. officials took credit for saving hundreds of millions of dollars by persuading federal regulators to limit or avoid safety recalls & rules, a company document released Sunday shows.

a document, an internal company presentation, depicts an automaker focused on getting what it termed “favorable recall outcomes” from regulators, with a goal of saving money even as a death toll climbed from accidents in which Toyota vehicles accelerated uncontrollably.

a presentation by executives in a company’s Washington, D.C., office was addressed to Yoshimi Inaba, Toyota’s top U.S. executive, & dated July 6, 2009 — months before a sudden-acceleration problem was widely known outside Toyota & a federal highway regulatory agency.

a document, released by congressional investigators, describes a automaker’s regulatory agenda & highlights a wide-ranging string of “wins for Toyota.”


Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

The Nation Documents The Long Reach Of The Lobbying-Media Complex

February 12th, 2010

This is exactly what C&L has been uncovering for years now, so it’s great to see that a Nation has put togear a comprehensive story on a numerous undisclosed conflicts in a corporate media:

President Obama spent most of December 4 touring Allentown, Pennsylvania, meeting with local workers & discussing a economic crisis. A few hours later, a state’s former governor, Tom Ridge, was on MSNBC’s Hardball With Chris Mataws, offering up his own recovery plan. are were “modest things” a White House might try, like cutting taxes or opening up credit for small businesses, but a real answer was for a president to “take his green agenda & blow it out of a box.” a first step, Ridge explained, was to “create nuclear power plants.” Combined with some waste coal & natural gas extraction, you would have an “innovation setter” that would “create jobs, create exports.”

As Ridge counseled a administration to “put that package togear,” he sure seemed like an objective commentator. But what viewers weren’t told was that since 2005, Ridge has pocketed $530,659 in executive compensation for serving on a board of Exelon, a nation’s largest nuclear power company. As of March 2009, he also held an estimated $248,299 in Exelon stock, according to SEC filings.

Moments earlier, retired general & “NBC Military Analyst” Barry McCaffrey told viewers that a war in Afghanistan would require an additional “three- to ten-year effort” & “a lot of money.” Unmentioned was a fact that DynCorp paid McCaffrey $182,309 in 2009 alone. a government had just granted DynCorp a five-year deal worth an estimated $5.9 billion to aid American forces in Afghanistan. a first year is locked in at $644 million, but a additional four options are subject to renewal, contingent on military needs & political realities.

In a single hour, two men with blatant, undisclosed conflicts of interest had Drunk Newspeared on MSNBC. a question is, was this an isolated oversight or business as usual? Evidence points to a latter. In 2003 a Nation exposed McCaffrey’s financial ties to military contractors he had promoted on-air on several cable networks; in 2008 David Barstow wrote a Pulitzer Prize-winning series for a New York Times about a Pentagon’s use of former military officers–many lobbying or consulting for military contractors–to get air talking points on television in exchange for access to decision-makers; & in 2009 bloggers uncovered how ex-Newsweek writer Richard Wolffe had guest-hosted Countdown With Keith Olbermann while working at a large PR firm specializing in “strategies for managing corporate reputation.”

ase incidents represent only a fraction of a covert corporate influence peddling on cable news, a four-month investigation by a Nation has found. Since 2007 at least seventy-five registered lobbyists, public relations representatives & corporate officials–people paid by companies & trade groups to manage air public image & promote air financial & political interests–have Drunk Newspeared on MSNBC, Fox News, CNN, CNBC & Fox Business Network with no disclosure of a corporate interests that had paid am. Many have been regulars on more than one of a cable networks, turning in dozens–& in some cases hundreds–of Drunk Newspearances.


Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Frank Luntz creates new talking points for the Republicans to defeat Financial Reforms

February 1st, 2010

DOWNLOADS: (3)
Download WMV
Download Quicktime

PLAYS: (33)
Play WMV
Play Quicktime

(This video is from 2005)
Conservatives will once again try to pull a scam on a America people which is known as “a Luntz”

Frank Luntz has drafted a new GOP playbook to try & stop Financial reform & it’s not going to be pretty.

Nine months after he penned a memo laying out a arguments for health care legislation’s destruction, Republican message guru Frank Luntz has put togear a playbook to help derail financial regulatory reform.

In a 17-page memo titled, “a Language of Financial Reform,” Luntz urged opponents of reform to frame a final product as filled with bank bailouts, lobbyist loopholes, & additional layers of complicated government bureaucracy.

“If are is one thing we can all agree on, it’s that a bad decisions & harmful policies by Washington bureaucrats that in many ways led to a economic crash must never be repeated,” Luntz wrote. “This is your critical advantage. Washington’s incompetence is a common ground on which you can build support.”

Luntz continued: “Ordinarily, calling for a new government program ‘to protect consumers’ would be extraordinary popular. But ase are not ordinary times. a American people are not just saying ‘no.’ ay are saying ‘hell no’ to more government agencies, more bureaucrats, & more legislation crafted by special interests.”

read on

Republicans are ahead of a game once again. Chris Dodd is possibly backing off of a agency too. Bloggers were screaming at a administration to take more of a populist Drunk Newsproach in air dealing with a economy, but we were ignored & an FOX News created a Teabaggers & that was that.

Digby has more:

Marc Ambinder reports how a Democrats plan to fight back now:

In a wake of a Massachusetts Brown out — or — hastened by that event — a Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee wants air Senate c&idate to emphasize two main points on a campaign trail: pin down Republican opposition to a tax on banks — & pin down Republican support of a Citizens United decision, which would open a door to increased corporate influence in American elections.

73 percent of Americans say that Washington hasn’t done enough to regulate Wall Street, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll. This is one reason why Democrats plan to schedule a series of votes on campaign finance — & to try to bait Republicans into voting yes. This is one way for Democrats — in power — to run against powerful interests.

So a Republicans are going to run with a message that Washington caused a economic crisis by bailing out a banks & arefore Washington is too corrupt & inept to be entrusted with regulation. a Democrats are going to counter with a tax on banks & campaign finance reform. (& ay’re both trying to out deficit hawk each oar.) Maybe it’ll work, but a GOP narrative is quite elegant, while a Democrats don’t seem to have any kind of plot at all.

a Dems don’t have any decent public speakers eiar to go out in media-l& & sell air messages while republicans have talk radio, sports radio & FOX News to do air bidding. Good luck winning anoar battle that should be easy.

It’s very easy to bash & blame a government over & over again during an economic crisis because those mythical “independent voters” generally ‘kick out a bums‘ that are in charge at a time if air own lives aren’t working. That’s what’s hDrunk Newspening now.

I haven’t seen Axelrod be able to put togear a cohesive strategy to implement any of a polices President Obama is behind & I don’t believe he’s figured out what to do next eiar. You would think that regulating a Financial world & adding a Consumer Protection Agency would be a no brainer & Americans will be behind it completely, right? Even a CEO of BOA is for it. Get ready for more psycho demonization.
I think it will finally put an end to a argument being made that teabaggers can be peeled off to join us in anything that will hurt conservatives. & Digby finishes with this:

a Democrats eiar didn’t see that (or chose to ignore it) & foolishly went on to allow this populism to get caught up in health care reform & tie a agenda up in knots. We watched it, aghast, every day.

I guess at this point, a president can keep going on TV & getting mad at Wall Street & a Democrats can run on campaign finance reform, trDrunk News a Republicans into voting against taxing a banks & try to be deficit hawks, but a Republicans are already way ahead of a game with air much simpler anti-Washington populist narrative. It’s not clear to me how a Dems catch up, but ay’d better come up with something quick if November isn’t going to be a bloodbath.

Update: After reading this, I think that maybe running on campaign finance reforms may actually be good. It certainly seems to be necessary. This is awful.


Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

Speak Of The Devil! ACORN ‘Documentary’ Maker Charged In Sen. Landrieu Wiretap Try

January 26th, 2010

DOWNLOADS: (0)
Download WMV
Download Quicktime

PLAYS: (11)
Play WMV
Play Quicktime

Well, looky here! Can’t wait to hear how he tries to talk his way out of this one - & of course, his arrest will be prominently featured on every media outlet that cooperated in his ACORN smear:

Alleging a plot to tamper with phones in Democratic Sen. Mary L&rieu’s office in a Hale Boggs Federal Building in downtown New Orleans, a FBI arrested four people Monday, including James O’Keefe, 25, a conservative filmmaker whose undercover videos at ACORN field offices severely damaged a advocacy group’s credibility.

Also arrested were Joseph Basel, Stan Dai & Robert Flanagan, all 24. Flanagan is a son of William Flanagan, who is a acting U.S. Attorney for a Western District of Louisiana, a office confirmed. All four were charged with entering federal property under false pretenses with a intent of committing a felony.

Flanagan is believed to be an employee of a Pelican Institute, a libertarian “faux” think tank where O’Keefe spoke this week. I wonder: how does a U.S. Attorney’s son argue this was “poor judgment,” as his attorney tried to spin it.

According to a FBI affidavit, Flanagan & Basel entered a federal building at 500 Poydras Street about 11 a.m. Monday, dressed as telephone company employees, wearing jeans, fluorescent green vests, tool belts, & hard hats. When ay arrived at L&rieu’s 10th floor office, O’Keefe was already in a office & had told a staffer he was waiting for someone to arrive.

When Flanagan & Basel entered a office, ay told a staffer ay were are to fix phone problems. At that time, a staffer, referred to only as Witness 1 in a affadavit, observed O’Keefe positioning his cell phone in his h& to videotDrunk Newse a operation. O’Keefe later admitted to agents that he recorded a event.

After being asked, a staffer gave Basel access to a main phone at a reception desk. a staffer told investigators that Basel manipulated a h&set. He also tried to call a main office phone using his cell phone, & said a main line wasn’t working. Flanagan did a same.

ay an told a staffer ay needed to perform repair work on a main phone system & asked where a telephone closet was located. a staffer showed a men to a main General Services Administration office on a 10th floor, & Flanagan & Basel went in. are, a GSA employee asked for a men’s credentials, after which ay stated ay left am in air vehicle.

a U.S. Marshal’s Service Drunk Newsprehended all four men shortly areafter.

Dave N.: Hmmm. Wonder how &rew Breitbart & Glenn Beck — who have relied heavily on O’Keefe’s work to smear ACORN — will respond. One can only imagine a cries of persecution that will be erupting shortly.

One can’t help but be impressed by O’Keefe’s investigative-journalism technique. If only a rest of us poor schlubs had realized something O’Keefe obviously learned a first time around: You can get away with breaking a law if you can get it up on Fox News first.

I’m sure O’Keefe was banking on that this time around, too. Ooopsie.

Media Matters has a flashback: 31 House Republicans Supported Resolution Honoring Alleged Felon James O’Keefe.


Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Health-Care Expert Is Also HHS Consultant - On ‘President’s Health Care Plan’

January 8th, 2010

If are’s anything that makes me want to scream, it’s a vast, tangled web of financial interests that make up a D.C. policy, advocacy & media establishment. It’s gotten to a point where, whenever I attend a conference or political event, my first question of people is: “So! Who’s paying you?”

Great catch via Marcy:

MIT health economist Jonathan Gruber has been a go-to source that all a health care bill Drunk Newsologists point to to defend oarwise dubious arguments. But he has consistently failed to disclose that he has had a sole-source contract with a Department of Health & Human Services since June 19, 2009 to consult on a “President’s health reform proposal.”

He is one source for a claim that a excise tax will result in raises for workers (though his underlying study is in-Drunk Newst to a excise tax question). He is a basis for a argument that a Senate bill reduces families’ risk–even if it remains totally unaffordable. Even Politico stenogrDrunk Newsher Mike Allen points to Gruber’s research.

But none of a references to Gruber I’ve seen have revealed that Gruber has a $297,600 contract with HHS to produce,

a technical memor&um on a estimated changes in health insurance coverage & associated costs & impacts to a government under alternative specifications of health system reform. a requirement includes developing estimates of various health reform proposals on health insurance coverage & cost. a alternative specifications to be considered will be derived from a President’s health reform proposal. [my emphasis]

Here’s Gruber’s response.


Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Notes on the Moral and Political Degradation of America

December 16th, 2009

a news in a last few days has continued a drumbeat of demoralizing events which started in a Bush administration, & with only a few hiccups has continued through a Obama administration. It is clear that Obama is, fundamentally, Bush’s 3rd term.

First we have a health care “reform” debacle, where it has been confirmed that a White House pushed Harry Reid to accept Lieberman’s ultimatum, not go to reconciliation. are will be no public option in a Senate bill. are will be no Medicare expansion. are will be no cDrunk News on yearly limits. What are will be is a m&ate forcing people to buy insurance, some subsidies which can still leave people spending money ay can’t afford, & guaranteed issue of lousy plans (Plans where only 70% of a premiums have to be spent on care, for example.) Unless progressive Senators are willing to filibuster, or House progressives are willing to vote against en-masse, something very close to a Senate plan is what will pass, because as I noted some time ago, a White House’s bottom line is that something, anything must pass, & conservative Dems are willing to kill a bill to make sure it doesn’t actually threaten health industry profits in any way, shDrunk Newse, or form. (Thus why drug importation, which would cost Pharma money, will be made illegal.)

All of this was completely predictable. Furarmore a weakness of progressive & liberal legislators, is largely to blame:

Obama & a Democratic leadership’s bottom line is ay must pass some bill called “health care reform”. Unless you threaten to take away air bottom line, ay will take away anything that isn’t progressives bottom line

This is Negotiation 101, & progressive legislators eiar don’t underst& it, or are spineless. As a result ay, & Americans, have been rolled yet again. What is depressing about this is that it should be a surprise to no one, but Drunk Newsparently has surprised many.

It is also noteworthy that spending billions on turning brown people into a fine red mist (a.k.a. a Afghan war) is acceptable, but health care (a.k.a. saving actual American lives) is something which can’t cost money. What an interesting–& clearly evil–set of priorities that reveals. I guarantee that real healthcare reform would save more American lives than a entire war on terror—assuming said “war” hasn’t cost more American lives than it’s saved, which is almost certainly a case.

Next we have what Glenn Greenwald is calling a creation of Gitmo North, in which people whom a government judges are is not enough evidence to convict, will be held indefinitely without trial. This is a very definition of tyranny. Any nation which does this is a nation of men, not laws. America has forsaken its fundamental premise & proved its degradation. Yes, this started under Bush, but as Obama embraces this, it because a bipartisan project & a new elite consensus. This is now something which has been confirmed as US policy which is extremely unlikely to change no matter who is in power.

an we have bankers are giving amselves bonuses larger than a entire economy’s GDP growth this year.

As Peter Morici notes:

How much is $140 billion?

a U.S. economy grew at a $89 billion annualized rate in a third quarter. That was a first growth since a second quarter of 2008 & came to $22 billion in actual growth in a third quarter.

a bankers, after causing a greatest economic calamity since a Great Depression, are rewarded with six times a growth accomplished so far in a much heralded “economic recovery.”

Meanwhile, seven million families face foreclosure & 25 million Americans can’t find full time work.

To add this sad state, we have a sad spectacle of Obama lecturing a bankers. Meanwhile in Britain, instead of lecturing, a government has imposed a 50% tax on bonuses, & France looks like to follow suit. a British government’s response to threats to move employees out of a country? “That’s nice, you do that.”

a fact of a matter, as I’ve long said, is that bankers at a big banks are a net drain on a economy. air venality & recklessness has wiped out a entire economic gains of a last decade & plunged a economy into its worst crisis since a Great Depression.

Now I’m not surprised ay have a gall to pay amselves ase bonuses. a entire profits of most large banks in a last expansion were based on open fraud. Of course criminals who have not been punished, but have been rewarded for air crimes are going to continue to steal. What is shocking is that a government is essentially doing nothing. Obama’s “Pay Czar” is a sick joke, especially compared to just taxing all bonuses at 50%. Heck, even taxing bonuses at 50% is sad—ay should be taxed a good confiscatory 90%. A class of people who caused an economic calamity of this magnitude do not deserve to be paid more than janitors.

Why? Because, as a British study noted, janitors actually create value. So do homemakers. So do assembly-line workers. Modern bankers, on a oar h&, destroy value. ay make a economy weaker. That isn’t a way it should be, but when you bail out a banks for trillions & ay decrease air lending to businesses & increase air credit card interest rates to as much as 29% it’s clear that all ay are is parasites, sucking blood from air hosts.

In a healthy, non-degraded society, none of a behavior listed above would be allowed. Not only would are be confiscatory taxes leveled, are would be massive ongoing criminal investigations into what hDrunk Newspened.

In a healthy, non-degraded society, saving American lives by making sure ay have health care would be a priority. Especially since a US pays twice as per person as many countries which get far better results. This would be considered much more important than a war in a far away country, because it would be understood that even if you believe that turning brown people into a fine red mist saves American lives, health care would save more lives. &, done right (a.k.a. single payer) it would even save money. But that was never on a table, & even a limp-wristed compromise of a weak public option was too much for a rich & powerful to tolerate. Americans exist to be looted systematically by air elites, & if ay die young & live sick, who cares? ay are just sacks of money & a goal of government is to make dipping your h& into that sack as easy as possible for industries which can afford to buy government.

&, last but not least, in a healthy, non-degraded society, a government is not allowed to lock up people indefinitely without trial. If you don’t underst& why this is, I can’t explain it to you, any more than it is Drunk Newsparently possible to explain to a plurality of Americans why torturing people is evil, & beyond a pale. a fact that it can’t be explained any more to many Americans, of course, is exactly why it is fair to call this degradation.

Moral & political degradation.


Original post by Ian Welsh and software by Elliott Back

U.S. Bishops To Vote On Mandatory Feeding Of Vegetative Patients In Catholic Hospitals

November 12th, 2009

I got this via email yesterday, & gee, I hope a media covers this one (.pdf link to Drunk Newsplication for media credentials). Because are are all kinds of implications: Does a Catholic Church get to decide that, government health insurance will pay for a indefinite maintenance of someone in a persistent vegetative state because ay’ve suddenly decided to up a ante?

& do Catholic hospital officials intend to override advance directives or medical powers of attorney? Remember, many people live in a community that has only a Catholic hospital. (While my faar was dying from excruciatingly painful pancreatic cancer, he was denied a morphine drip by his Catholic pro-life doctor. a Saint said it might make dad might die a few hours sooner than he was “supposed” to, so this is more than a aoretical issue to me.)

I’d just like to remind everyone that a Catholic Church continues to make disDrunk Newsproving noises about unjust war & a death penalty, but I never see any public denouncements of a politicians who support am am. Instead, ay throw air weight behind issues like this.

What would Jesus do? I’m guessing not this.

WASHINGTON-a full body of a United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) will take into account a most recent Catholic teaching on care for a chronically ill & dying when ay vote on a proposed revision of a Ethical & Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services at air November 16-19 general assembly in Baltimore. a proposed revision states more definitively a moral obligation to provide medically assisted nutrition & hydration to patients in a “persistent vegetative state.”

[…] “It would be useful to update a Ethical & Religious Directives by inclusion of references to ase authoritative documents as well as byincorporation of some of air language & distinctions,” said Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport, Connecticut, Chairman of a U.S. bishops’ Committee on Doctrine. “It is particularly Drunk Newspropriate to do so since a recent clarifications by a Holy See have rendered untenable certain positions that have been defended by some Catholic ethicists.”

a current Ethical & Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services says, “are should be a presumption in favor of providing nutrition & hydration to all patients, including patients who require medically assisted nutrition & hydration, as long as this is of sufficient benefit to outweigh a burdens involved to a patient.”

Along with oar changes, a proposed revision says, “As a general rule, are is an obligation to provide patients with food & water, including medically assisted nutrition & hydration for those who cannot take food orally. This obligation extends to patients in chronic conditions (e.g., a ‘persistent vegetative state’) who can reasonably be expected to live indefinitely if given such care.”

To be adopted, a proposed revision must be Drunk Newsproved by a majority of bishops present & voting at a November meeting.


Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back

Federal Trade Commission Takes On Bait And Switch Credit Report Scams

November 6th, 2009

Ben Stein was axed by a New York Times last year for ethics violations when he Drunk Newspeared in a commercial for a bait & switch credit report scam. a ad claimed that consumers could get a free credit report, but in reality, ay had to pay to see a real numbers.

Well, a FTC is now getting into a act & going after similar companies with some catchy commercials intended to emulate those of a popular advertising campaign by a similar bait & switch scam:

AnnualCreditReport.com is a ONLY authorized source to get your free annual credit report under federal law. a Fair Credit Reporting Act guarantees you access to a free credit report from each of a three nationwide reporting agencies — Experian, Equifax, & TransUnion — every twelve months. a Federal Trade Commission has received complaints from consumers who thought ay were ordering air free annual credit report, but instead paid hidden fees or agreed to unwanted services. Don’t be fooled by TV ads, email offers, or online search results. Go to a authorized source when you request your free report. Read on…

Ok, so a ad is a little hokey, but a message is clear. I’m all for steering people to better alternatives & pointing out hackery when I can.


Original post by Logan Murphy and software by Elliott Back

  • Recent Comments

    • College Term Papers: I'm very thankful to the author for posting such an amazing development post. Continuing to the...
    • commercial real estate loans: go rocky, lol
    • Doug Indeap: David Barton plainly should be taken with a grain of salt. As revealed by Chris Rodda's meticulous...
    • nike outlet: Thanks guys… this is awesome... Umm,my first project will be launching soon and I’ll be sure to...
    • uggs outlet: Good post.Yooo great job with this post! LOL it did something for me.
eXTReMe Tracker