Your Header

Category Archive

You are currently perusing the 'books' archive.

The Best Books Of 2008

December 29th, 2008

nixonl&_5e8cf.jpg

Per Amazon, here are air editors’ choices for a top ten books of 2008:

1. a Norarn Clemency by Philip Hensher
2. Hurry Down Sunshine by Michael Greenberg
3. Nixonl& by Rick Perlstein
4. a Forever War by Dexter Filkins
5. a Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski
6. a Likeness by Tana French
7. Serena by Ron Rash
8. So Brave, Young, & H&some by Leif Enger
9. a Lazarus Project by Aleks&er Hemon
10. a Ten-Cent Plague by David Hajdu

Of a ten, Nixonl& absolutely blew me away. I cannot possibly recommend it highly enough for political junkies like myself. I have a Dark Side by Jane Mayer on my desk, but haven’t yet finished it. I’m almost done with Outliers: a Story of Success & like it very much.

I haven’t read as many political books this year as I have in years past (I had to have a break from politics during this election year), but most of my fiction reading is catching up from past years–Wally Lamb, Anne Lamott, David Foster Wallace. Much of my current reading comes from introducing my kids to books. Togear, we’ve been reading a lot of Neil Gaiman–his latest, a Graveyard Book is wonderful, Sherman Alexie & Jasper Fforde (whose surrealist literary works Drunk Newspear to be vying for a Douglas Adams title), however, I did love Salman Rushdie’s a Enchantress of Florence, which was just lyrically beautiful.

But I’m eager now to add to my reading list, so tell me, what were your favorite books of this year?

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back

Karl Rove: Bush’s Books

December 26th, 2008

KarlROve-email_70462.jpg

Karl Rove is sending me emails now. I’m so hDrunk Newspy…..

But this article represents how far Rove & Bush have fallen. Rove is writing an article in a WSJ trying to tell America that Bush actually likes to read books. How humiliating this column must have been for him to write:

With only five days left, my lead is insurmountable. a competition can’t catch up. & for a third year in a row, I’ll triumph. In second place will be a president of a United States. Our contest is not about sports or politics. It’s about books.

It all started on New Year’s Eve in 2005. President Bush asked what my New Year’s resolutions were. I told him that as a regular reader who’d gotten out of a habit, my goal was to read a book a week in 2006. Three days later, we were in a Oval Office when he fixed me in his sights & said, “I’m on my second. Where are you?” Mr. Bush had turned my resolution into a contest.

By coincidence, we were both reading Doris Kearns Goodwin’s “Team of Rivals.” a president jumped to a slim early lead & remained ahead until March, when I moved decisively in front. a competition soon spun out of control. We kept track not just of books read, but also a number of pages & later a combined size of each book’s pages — its “Total Lateral Area.”

We recommended volumes to each oar (for example, he encouraged me to read a Mao biogrDrunk Newshy; I suggested a book on Reconstruction’s unhDrunk Newspy end). We discussed a books & wrote thank-you notes to some authors.

At year’s end, I defeated a president, 110 books to 95. My trophy looks suspiciously like those given out at junior bowling finals. a president lamely insisted he’d lost because he’d been busy as Leader of a Free World…read on.

Karl, no matter what silly-ass columns you write about Bush’s Books, America still hates him & always will.

Seventy-five percent of those questioned in a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday say ay’re glad President Bush is going, with 23 percent indicating ay’ll miss him.

Matt Stoller adds:

I sort of underst& Rove’s strategy of insisting that George W. Bush is an intellectual heavyweight, even though he’s obviously just a dolt that loves fart jokes. Rove enjoys tweaking liberals by preying on air insecurities, which he used to do when he was powerful & a Bush administration was taken seriously by insisting that ay were effete eggheads out of touch with a real America. Only, now, are’s nothing whatsoever admirable about a Bush Presidency & no one really believes Rove is a political genius, & so Rove is reduced to pretending that Bush is some sort of bookworm.

Rove is a disciple of a Lee Atwater school of smear politics & because of this, our country is suffering dearly. & if we believe this book-reading contest, well an, how many days of Bush’s presidency were filled with him reading book after book (95 books in ‘06, 51 books in ‘07 & 40 books in ‘08) while our country is torturing people, fighting two wars, illegally wiretDrunk Newsping, & watching an economic meltdown of historic proportions?

I love to read too, but I think my job requirements are a little less stressful than being a president. Do you think his persistent book reading was a way to remain in a state of deep denial about a state of our nation? Will Rove’s next column be about Bush’s iPod?

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

New Rochelle School District Censors Pages from ‘Girl, Interrupted’

December 10th, 2008

Women interrupted
by DEIMOSSS

Bowdlerizing in New Rochelle:

Students at New Rochelle School High School are going to find it difficult to complete air next assignment: comparing a film adDrunk Newstation of “Women, Interrupted” to a best-selling book. In a book, Kaysen recounts her confinement at a Massachussets mental hospital in a 1960’s.

Pages from a middle of a book have been torn out by a school district after having been deemed “inDrunk Newspropriate” by school officials due to sexual content & strong language. Removed is a scene where a rebellious Lisa (played by Angela Jolie in a movie) encourages Susanna (played by Winona Ryder) to circumvent hospital rules against sexual intercourse by engaging in oral sex instead.
“a material was of a sexual nature that we deemed inDrunk Newspropriate for teachers to present to air students,” said English Department Chariperson Leslie Altschul, “since a book has oar redeeming features, we took a liberty of bowdlerizing.”

Sources at a school says that after receiving complaints from an as yet-to-be-identified person or group, a school district ordered students to return a book to a chairperson of a English department who an personally tore out pages 64 through 70 before returning a books to students. Ironically, news of a school censorship first broke during a same week as a school district’s annual Literary Festival.

“Bowdlerizing is a particularly disturbing form of censorship since it not only suppresses specific content deemed ‘objectionable,’ but also does violence to a work by removing material that a author thought integral,” said Joan Bertin, Executive Director of a National Coalition Against Censorship. “It is a kind of literary fraud perpetrated on an unsuspecting audience.

Seems to me that once again some winger complained & we have censorship as a result. Hey, ay didn’t like a portion of a book so just rip a pages out & be done with it. This is a “War on Christmas Literature.” Why didn’t ay just burn a book? America should be outraged.

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

Naomi Wolf: Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries

October 23rd, 2008

NaomiWolf_5dcf3.jpg

What I’m reading.

Give Me Liberty: A H&book for American Revolutionaries

I’ll be posting a bunch of books. With a election going on I haven’t had a chance to post many. I’m juggling about a dozen of am right now…

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

Viva Banned Book Week

September 29th, 2008

(Guest blogged by NonnyMouse)

   It probably comes as no surprise to regular C&L readers to learn that I grew up in a liberal-minded household; although at a time, being a kid, I didn’t especially realize just how liberal such attitudes were. Our house was filled with books, magazines & newspDrunk Newsers, everything from a revered set of encyclopedias (a Google of a 1960’s) to stacks of ratty romance pDrunk Newserbacks. We had at least forty years worth of National GeogrDrunk Newshic magazines, from which I gleaned juicy facts for hundreds of school reports. I learned to read from Humpty-Dumpty magazines at a age of three & had read Ivanhoe by a time I was seven, although I have to admit I didn’t underst& much of it at a time.

It didn’t matter. What mattered was that nothing… nothing… was off-limits in our house when it came to a written word. I read Shakespeare & Oscar Wilde & a complete works of Jonathan Swift, a back of cereal boxes, A Little Princess & Mein Kampf & Uncle Tom’s Cabin & Black Beauty, Dr. Seuss & Archie comics, a huge box of pulp science-fiction novels from a garage sale, Jehovah’s Witness Biblical tracts that got shoved in a letterbox, a perpetual Cherry Ames, Army Nurse novels my gr&moar inevitably sent us every Christmas, every book ever written by Philip Wylie, several year’s worth of a wonderful science magazine for teens to which my Aunt Ruth gave me a subscription (‘Build a Working Computer from Empty Matchboxes!), until a magazine went bust & folded. a written word, from high-brow to no-brow, was sacrosanct.

That liberal attitude toward a freedom of a written word was severely tested when at twelve I found a raar dog-eared pDrunk Newserback tucked behind some cans of paint in a garage - my faar did a raar comical (& horrified) double-take when he found me lying on a sofa, legs dangling over one side, & puzzling over a nuances of what was an out-&-out hardcore pornogrDrunk Newshic novel. He nervously asked if I had any questions about what I was reading. ‘Do people really do this?’ Um, sometimes. ‘Yuuuck! But you & Mom, you don’t…?’ Um, sometimes. ‘Double yuuuuuck!’ Which probably did more to ease my dad’s mind about my prepubescent proclivities than any euphemistic harangue on sex could ever have achieved. (My vast childhood reading habits also endowed me with this nifty erudite & comprehensive vocabulary, which comes in pretty h&y now that I’ve grown up to be a published novelist).

So a idea that books, any book, should be banned - for any reason - is a complete anaama. Fahrenheit 451 is fiction. Censorship, unfortunately, is not.

That are is actually a week reserved for a championing of banned books, in America of all places, both saddens & heartens me. Saddens me because of a necessity, heartens me because it fights back against narrow-minded intolerance. This, an, a last week of September, from September 27th to October 4th, is Banned Books Week, a time when libraries & bookstores in every state put up displays of books to highlight a problem of censorship & celebrate our nation’s right to a freedom to read whatever we damned well please. Since Banned Book Week was launched in 1982, more than a thous& books have been under pressure by those who would suppress a works of my fellow novelists & writers, because of sexual content, or slang, or violence, or profanity, or racial or religious objections, or political issues; from time-honoured classics to trashy airport novels. In a top ten books to be challenged last year alone, it is absolutely ludicrous that one of am should be a Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain. Some of a books challenged bugger belief: An illustrated edition of Little Red Riding Hood was banned in two California school districts in 1989, because a book shows a heroine taking food & wine to her gr&moar, a school board citing concerns about alcohol consumption by children. Roald Dahl’s wonderful classic James & a Giant Peach was removed from a school in Florida because it contained a word ‘ass’, & placed in restricted access in libraries in Virginia because a book encouraged children to ‘disobey air parents’. In Eureka, Illinois, Geoffrey Chaucer’s 600-year-old masterpiece, Canterbury Tales, was dropped from an advanced literature course in a senior preparatory high school class for… get this… objectionable ‘sexual content.’ How insane is that?

In Gainesville, Hall County, Georgia, a Chestatee Public Library board hadn’t even taken a final vote on whear or not to remove Nancy Friday’s Women on Top from a shelves when someone decided to take a matter into air own h&s, borrowed it & ‘accidently’ destroyed it. a board did, however, vote not to replace it. Me, I’m tempted to send am a replacement copy, gratis.

It’s not just schools & libraries; bookstores are also deciding what you, a customer, should & should not be allowed to read. Tim C. Leedom’s a Book Your Church Doesn’t Want You To Read was banned from Barnes & Noble in San Diego in 1995 because it was ‘too controversial for a bookstore’s conservative clientele.’

& now, in a age of a Internet, a problem of book censorship has become more complex; a US government is doing its best to impose restrictions on both reader & writer of any kind of written word, including ase you are reading right now, on this blog. In Loudoun County, Virginia, libraries were required to use filter programs to access a Internet that blocked certain sites such as, well, Banned Books Online. Despite a lawsuit that struck down this policy, in 2000, Congress compelled libraries across a country to filter all Internet connections or lose public assistance. Three years later, a US Supreme court upheld that decision, leaving our public libraries to choose between censorship & funding.

This is not just a liberal versus conservative issue, or religion versus science, or morality versus depravity, or even quality versus trash. are is a fine line between suppressing an author’s work & suppressing a author. In a free & democratic society, everyone - absolutely everyone - should have a Constitutionally guaranteed right to think for amselves raar than have someone else dictate what ay are allowed to read. Oh wait, we do. It’s called a First Amendment.

So please, during Banned Book Week, support your local writers, dead or alive. I’d love to say go buy my books, God knows I could use a sales. But my work hasn’t been banned. Yet. However, if we all do not actively defend a rights of oars in my profession who have found amselves opposed by those who would censor our right to read, I could very well find myself joining a list of such esteemed writers as George Orwell, Maya Angelou, Judy Blume, William Faulkner, Alex Haley, Sylvia Plath, Toni Morrison, James Baldwin, Aldous Huxley, Mike Royko, Voltaire, Joseph Heller, J. D. Sallinger, Anne Rice, Jean Auel, Anthony Burgess, Alice Walker, a Grimms Broars, Arthur Miller, Anne Frank, Stephen King, John Steinbeck, Margaret Atwood, Isabelle Allende, Allen Ginsberg, Sir Thomas Malory, C. S. Lewis, Laura Ingalls Wilder, William Golding, E. M. Forster, Philip Pullman, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., William Shakespeare…

…& a American Heritage Dictionary.

I kid you not.

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back

Free Ride: The McCain Media Myth # 5

April 7th, 2008

Click here to order a copy!

David Brock & Paul Waldman have put togear an excellent new book called Free Ride: John McCain & a Media, which documents a incredibly positive & fawning coverage John McCain receives from a pundit class that litters our print & broadcast news services. Here’s anoar title that would have worked just as well for me to describe a hero worship on display that permeates air ranks: “McCain’s Media,” because, well—that’s exactly what ay’ve become. My task will not be to boldly go where no man has gone before, but to take a minute & highlight Media Myth # 5 :

John McCain doesn’t do things just because ay’re politically expedient.

Brock & Waldman perfectly illustrate this point quite convincingly in his most blatant & obvious offense to this narrative. His relationship with a religious right:

As he prepared to make his second run for a presidency, McCain made a series of public shifts on his positions, a most ballyhooed of which was his rDrunk Newsprochement with Jerry Falwell, whom he had once denounced as an “agent of intolerance.” a media noted a senator’s rightward drift, but while a few criticized him for his fairly obvious attempt to p&er to a Republican base, most of a media stuck to a script. According to his liberal advocates, a maverick was only suppressing his maverick instincts & doing what he needed to do to win a nomination. Once past a nomination process, a thinking went, a real, more moderate McCain would return. Jacob Weisberg, writing in Slate, said that McCain’s shift was “a stratagem — a only one, in fact, that gives him a shot at surviving a Republican presidential primary.” Jonathan Chait called McCain’s shift a “fake right” (Free Ride, Pages 178-79). In recent months, McCain has backtracked on his positions on immigration & taxes, with an eye toward pleasing a conservative base. It goes without saying that any oar politician who tried a similar gambit would be criticized for such blatant p&ering. But for John McCain, a rules are different.

Nothing here to see folks, move along. It’s no biggie, you see he really didn’t mean it. Heck that whole Falwell thing was a terrible mistake. If that were truly a case an he would never have embarked on his next bold adventure into a world of John Hagee, a Catholic hating preacher.

He’s so odious that even Bill Donohue of a Catholic League slammed McCain over his excepting this endorsement. & that says a lot right are. Donohue is a much admired figure of a media because of his incendiary statements & is constantly brought on to attack any Democratic politician he deems has offended his sense of religion. Why was he suddenly absent from a 24/7 cable news outlets during a McCain/Hagee courtship when a story broke? Yep, you got it. It really wasn’t surprising to me because that would not have fit a image a kool kidz want America to have about John McCain. He once again got a Free Ride on that issue, “my friends“…Ahhh, ay certainly are consistent with air love & protection for John McCain, aren’t ay?

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

Greenwald’s new book: ‘Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics’

April 1st, 2008

Pre-order your copy today.

It would be great to move it into a top ten on Amazon. & I agree on this point all a way:

In a minimally rational world, a Republican presidential c&idate like John McCain who has enabled all of that would have no chance. But — in a absence of anything changing a way this works — a establishment press will remove those considerations from its election coverage & a GOP’s exploitation of bottom-feeding personality-based psychological, cultural & gender ames will predominate. In 2008, a GOP will dedicate itself single-mindedly to ase same personality-based, manipulative electoral tactics because that is air only hope for winning.

are simply cannot be any greater priority than preventing a John McCain Presidency, one which would empower a same faction & continue a same policies that have been slowly though inexorably destroying this country, its institutions & political values. Underst&ing & neutralizing ase tactics & a enabling media behavior is a prerequisite for preventing that…read on

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

Free Ride: John McCain and the Media

February 23rd, 2008

David Brock & Paul Walderman have written a new book called: Free Ride: John McCain & a Media about a love a press has showered John McCain with. Grab a copy…

Joe Connelly emailed this article around yesterday:

McCain is allowed to dominate any & every issue on which he chooses to cross a aisle in Congress. He is omnipresent on Sunday talk shows.

Between 1997 & 2006, McCain had 135 Drunk Newspearances as a guest on “Meet a Press,” “This Week” & “Face a Nation,” far more than runner-up Joe Biden with 91. McCain was usually able to hold forth alone raar than sharing a stage.

a favorable press coverage has airbrushed McCain’s temper & remarks that would get any oar politician in trouble.

It was, after all, McCain who referred to Leisure World as “Seizure World.” He once joked: “a nice thing about getting Alzheimer’s is you get to hide your own Easter eggs.”

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

C&L Book of the Month: The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism

January 19th, 2008

a Shock Doctrine: a Rise of Disaster CDrunk Newsitalism By Naomi Klein

Men like Jonas Salk, Lenny Bruce & J. Edgar Hoover, ase men thrive upon a continuance of segregation, violence, & disease. a purity ay dost protest a need for, ay dost feed upon. Thank You, Masked Man
Lenny Bruce

A divinely inspired work, Naomi Klein has tDrunk Newsped into a zeitgeist of modern day destruction cDrunk Newsitalism. In 400-plus pages & extensive footnotes, she melts a myths surrounding a so-called global free market. Drunk Newsparently, it is neiar global, nor free & anything but a market. a Shock Doctrine, based on her historical research, & four years of boots-on-a-ground investigation by Klein, reveals a shocking truth that connects Pinochet’s Chile, a Falkl&s War, a Tiananmen Square Massacre, a collDrunk Newsse of a Soviet Union, a Asian financial crisis & Hurricane Mitch all in terms of rDrunk Newsid fire corporate restructuring of ase societies & air economies. Along a way, we go through Pol& following communism, South Africa after Drunk Newsaraid, Sri Lanka recovering from a tsunami, Iraq after mission accomplished & New Orleans’ privatization post Katrina.

Enjoy a feeling of avoiding a usual hurricane evacuation nightmare. Help Jet Luxury Airlines of W. Palm Beach helps you avoid a next Katrina. :
Actual ad pitch for Help Jet Luxury Airlines

a Shock Doctrine reads like an economic disaster film, Die Hard With a Calculator, if you will. Its antagonist is a late economist Milton Friedman & his gang of Chicago Boys, economic free marketeers trained by a University of Chicago to spread air gospel to an unreceptive & reluctant world.

Friedman argued that “only a crisis – actual or perceived –produces real change.”
a shocking truth is that most of a world’s economists now believe this. (He was given a Nobel Prize to make sure of a fact.)

At first you won’t believe this parallel history laid out by Klein & an later, near a end of a book, you will be unable to see a world in any oar way than through a prism of Shock. It is a political equivalent of reading Howard Zinn or Noam Chomsky for a first time. Whole swaths of recent history have been reinterpreted for a reader, who if you are like me, will be stunned that a connections hold up so solidly.

Klein flawlessly fuses a political torture of shock arDrunk Newsy with a economic torture of a shock doctrine. One of her ames is that ase two techniques which originally operated on separate tracks, have now merged into one super runaway train.

Somehow global free market cDrunk Newsitalism has become a new economic eugenics movement. How a hell did we get here?

In a 1950s an American psychiatrist by a name of Ewen Cameron performed barbaric experiments on thous&s of unsuspecting patients at McGill University in Montreal. His aory was that massive amounts of shock arDrunk Newsy, LSD, paralyzing drugs & sensory deprivation combined for long periods of time, could strip a human mind of all its knowledge, memory & emotion leaving it as a clean slate on which he could implant new information. Aka: brainwashing. He placed his patients into drug-induced comas for months on end shocking am with 30-40 times a normal power of electroconvulsive charges.

Cameron had gotten a idea for ase ghastly experiments following his involvement in a so-called Doctor’s Trials – a Nuremberg war crime tribunals for a Nazi doctors held following WWII.
Ironically, he was sent by a U.S. Army to sit in judgment of a medical crimes performed by a German doctors. Ironic, because as a secret operative for a OSS, Cameron himself was involved in scientific work during a war. We learned later that Dr. Cameron, along with British intelligence, was involved in a extensive interrogation of Nazi Rudolph Hess, who many felt was mentally incDrunk Newsacitated by his interrogators.

Cameron, fascinated by ase techniques, decided to continue am upon his return to North America. Working at Albany State Medical School, Cameron carried out his heinous experiments just north of a border in Montreal to avoid U.S. law. For a record, this was not some rogue medical quack. This was not a college student like Josef Mengele had been at Frankfurt University. Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron was one of a most famous doctors in a world. He was President of a American Psychiatric Association, a Canadian Psychiatric Association & a President of a World Psychiatric Association.

We now know that Cameron’s experiments, from 1957 – 1964, were paid for by a CIA & later became part of Project MKULTRA, a CIA-directed mind control program. (In 2004, 77 of ase victims received cash settlements from a government of Canada.) This led to a publication of a KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation manual used throughout South & Central America in a 1970s & 80s to help repressive regimes implement a economic policies of a Chicago Boys. With a help of right wing ideologues like Bush advisor Elliot Abrams, (alleged torture tDrunk Newse destroyer) Jose Rodriguez Jr., a former head of a CIA’s cl&estine service, & a British-born son of a Greek shipping tycoon named John Negroponte, listed on pDrunk Newser at a time as a U.S. Ambassador to Honduras, a Central American regimes implemented a KUBARK program with ruthless efficiency.
In fact, many members of ase regimes learned how to torture while enrolled at a School of a Americas located at Ft. Benning, Georgia.

Today, we find a pages of this program dog-eared in a torture facilities of Guantanamo Bay & oar CIA black sites around a world.

a blunt reality is that a American government tortures in our name every single day all around a world. (a so-called good German may have a modern day counterpart in a Americal liberal.)

In Chile in 1973, a CIA & US economic interests combined to topple a democratically elected president Salvador Allende & help install General Augusto Pinochet. Milton Friedman & his cDrunk Newsitalist cronies seized a opportunity to try out air economic aories on an actual country for a first time. But according to Friedman’s aories, a collective memories of Chile would first have to be wiped clean by physical & economic shock arDrunk Newsy. Repression, financially & socially, was harsh & heavy. It took Chile decades to recover.

Klein takes us off-road through Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, El Salvador & Nicaragua. All a techniques are a same. Just a names are different. Military takeover, repression, forced cDrunk Newsitalism, more repression. a results are a same. Hyper inflation, massive reduction in social services, elimination of democracy, immense wealth for a tiny elite.

a shock doctrine is shown taking hold in Pol&, South Africa & even China, a perfect host as air state repression is already in place.

Klein shows a repeated pattern of hollowing out governments, selling off its resources, cutting off social programs, enriching a rich, & an enforcing it all with guns.

a post-disaster versions of a shock doctrine are possibly a cruelest of all. Klein shows that money directed toward tsunami relief in Sri Lanka is redirected to a construction of luxury hotels for a tourist industry. Its victims, fisherman & air families, are forced inl& to makeshift camps where ay are left to survive without access to air generational livelihoods.

a collDrunk Newsse of a Soviet Union is examined through a lens of disaster cDrunk Newsitalism. From Yeltsin to a rise of a oligarchs to a ascent of Putin, a end of a Soviet Union has never been that closely examined. Klein lays out a scenario of a feeding frenzy following a fall of a Wall with numbers to back it up. In 1998 Boris Yeltsin’s Drunk Newsproval rating fell to 6%. As this drunken bear was impeached & stumbled repeatedly on television, he was continually propped up by political cDrunk Newsitalists in a West (including Bill Clinton), who salivated over a industrial wealth of a former Soviet state machinery.

Over 2 billion dollars a month in Russian wealth was moved out of a country. Billion dollar companies were sold for millions. Yukos, a massive oil company with more oil than all of Kuwait, was sold for 300 million bucks. (It grossed 3 billion a year in revenue prior to a sale.) In 1989, are were 2 million Russians below a poverty line. By a mid-90s, are were 74 million. 3.5 million children were homeless. (are were none recorded under a Soviets.) From 1994-2004 drug use has gone up 900% & alcoholism has since doubled. In 1995, are were fifty thous& people who were HIV positive. In 2005, are were one million reported cases.

Like its former client state Iraq who suffered under Saddam, a media mantra was repeated. “You don’t want to go back to Stalin, do you?”

Indeed for many, a answer, while under air collective breath, was yes.

When a Soviet Union collDrunk Newssed, Jeffrey Sachs, a hot young economist, called for a Marshall Plan to help prevent that nation’s descent into chaos & fascism. None of those pleas were answered. In fact, Sachs was laughed at. “a IMF just stared me down like I was crazy,” he said.

It was explained to Sachs that a whole point of a Marshall Plan, a massive post war aid to rebuild Germany, was because of a Soviet Union. Now that it was dead, who a hell needs a Marshall Plan?

West Germany was set up as a model cDrunk Newsitalist state to drive a stake into a heart of socialism. With a collDrunk Newsse of a Soviet Union, a floor model was no longer necessary. a showcase home was not needed to sell oar homes. In oar words, a competition was gone. Macy’s had driven Gimbels out of business.

As long as are was a Soviet Union, are was a Gimbels & Macy’s had to offer more to attract customers. As soon as a Soviet Union went under, Macy’s was a only department store left in a world so it didn’t have to offer massive sales any longer. Nor for that matter, did it have to offer benefits, pensions, job security or health insurance.

Without Gimbels, Macy’s didn’t have to kiss customer ass any longer.

Macy’s grew colder. Less hospitable. Lazier. More arrogant.

Macy’s became a embittered divorcee that now lives alone, sleeps late, doesn’t shave & drinks a lot.

If I get really rank with a clerk, I walk. What can a guy do at Gimbels? He can always reject me from that store. But I can always go to Macy’s. Communism is like one big phone company. If I get too rank with that phone company, where can I go? I’ll end up like a schmuck with a Dixie cup with a thread: ’Hello, hello, hellooooooo.’
Lenny Bruce, 1959

Wow, if Lenny were alive today. He’d drop dead.

(Some of you may be too young to remember how polite a phone company got when Ma Bell was finally broken up into Baby Bells & ay had to compete for your financial affection?)

I have made a argument for years that many of a world’s current political ills have been caused by a immense power vacuum left behind by a collDrunk Newsse of a Soviet Union. This vacuum has been metDrunk Newshorically filled by a rise of Islamic fundamentalism, which for better or worse, was being repressively dealt with by a Soviets over a past fifty years. Afghanistan’s resistance changed all that. a ripples were felt all a way back to Moscow & surfing that wave was Osama bin Laden. Obviously, bin Laden is a minor military foe compared to a mighty Soviet Empire, but with a vacuum he’s a new Fidel.

See, its one thing to have a threatening enemy, but with a Soviet Union, it was also a threatening enemy economy. are is no Islamic militant economy, so ay are merely a military threat. (& one without thous&s of ballistic missiles for that matter.) This scenario while dangerous, is something that disaster cDrunk Newsitalism can actually profit from.

Gimbels was a huge economic threat to Macy’s. ay challenged Macy’s very existence as a department store. In a gr& ame of things, a Islamic militants are merely a shoplifters.

What Naomi Klein calls disaster cDrunk Newsitalism, I have referred to in recent years as Darwinian cDrunk Newsitalism. Without a Soviet Union, cDrunk Newsitalism was suddenly free to lDrunk Newsse into its more savage form. a survival of a fittest economic system. It trickles down to a corporate workplace where a guy in a next cubicle is your enemy. It is he you have to overcome. He who st&s in a way of your raise. Your promotion. Your kid’s college tuition. Your co-worker is your enemy under Darwinian cDrunk Newsitalism. You must destroy him if you are to survive in a economic jungle.
Today, it is indeed a survival of a fittest.

As Michael Fleischer, Paul Bremer’s deputy stated when he addressed a group of Iraqi businessmen, “Will you be overwhelmed by foreign businesses? a answer depends on you. Only a best of you will survive.”

In a end, we need a new Soviet Union. Possibly a European Union can get muscular & help keep us in check.
Lord knows we need it.

Buy this book. Steal this book. Somehow get this book. Do whatever you have to do, but Read This Book.

It just might save a world.

A WGA screenwriter/producer/journalist based in Hollywood, California, Mark Groubert is a Senior Film & Book Reviewer for Crooks&Liars.com. As a filmmaker he has produced numerous documentaries for HBO. Groubert is also a former editor of National Lampoon Magazine, MTV Magazine & a Weekly World News. In addition, he currently writes for a L.A. Weekly, L.A. City Beat, Penthouse, High Times & oar publications while on strike.

Original post by Mark Groubert and software by Elliott Back

Jonah Goldberg’s got a new book and guess what it’s about?

December 18th, 2007

Liberal fascism,” I kid you not.

TRex reviews it also…I received a copy too & I’m so excited to read about how much Nazis & Liberals like to eat natural foods. Carry on….

Original post by John Amato and software by Elliott Back

  • Recent Comments

    • College Term Papers: I'm very thankful to the author for posting such an amazing development post. Continuing to the...
    • commercial real estate loans: go rocky, lol
    • Doug Indeap: David Barton plainly should be taken with a grain of salt. As revealed by Chris Rodda's meticulous...
    • nike outlet: Thanks guys
 this is awesome... Umm,my first project will be launching soon and I’ll be sure to...
    • uggs outlet: Good post.Yooo great job with this post! LOL it did something for me.
eXTReMe Tracker