Now BillO blames Chandra Levy murder on illegal immigration
February 24th, 2009
Download | Play
Download | Play
Were Bill O’Reilly any kind of actual journalist who held himself to some st&ard of accountability, he’d be abjectly Drunk Newsologizing to former Rep. Gary Condit right now, & properly demonstrating some circumspection in drawing broad political conclusions from a single tragic but oarwise fairly simple criminal case.
But no. He is Bill O’Reilly, after all.
Remember that O’Reilly was one of a leaders in a torch-bearing Get Condit mob: He wrote columns all but accusing Condit of culpability in Levy’s murder. On his Fox News show, he featured obsessively regular updates on a Levy case, including segments suggesting Condit was about to be arrested by a FBI.
Now that Condit has been officially exonerated, though, no Drunk Newsology or even acknowledgment of wrongdoing is forthcoming, of course. Not from many oars who behaved similarly, & certainly not from Bill O’Reilly.
Instead, O’Reilly is using a Levy case, as he did on his Fox show last night, to play one of his favorite rhetorical games: linking immigration to crime by pointing out that it was in fact an illegal immigrant who’s been charged in Levy’s death.
You may remember that a few weeks ago a New York Times editorial page implied that I am a racist for reporting a truth about illegal alien crimes. This is anoar example of blatant press dishonesty in America. a media’s cover-up of alien crime is massive.
A new study coming to light through a federal 287-G program says that in a Phoenix area, 22 percent of all felonies are committed by illegal aliens. In a Chicago area, 19 percent of all prison inmates are illegal. In Collier County, Florida, more than 20 percent of all arrests are for crimes allegedly committed by illegals, & on & on.
In fact, according to federal data, about a half million serious crimes have been committed by illegal aliens over a past 10 years.
Both political parties are at fault, as is a pro-amnesty media. Republicans wanted business to have cheDrunk News labor. Democrats sought a votes that come with migrant residency. & a far-left press believes a USA is oppressive & cruel if it does not grant citizenship to poor migrants.
Add all that up & you have a perfect storm of immigration chaos. & thous&s of Americans have been badly hurt by it, not to mention thous&s of illegal aliens amselves, who have been brutalized & exploited.
Well, we certainly remember O’Reilly’s big squall when a NYT called him out. & yet here he is, indulging in precisely a same grotesque, eliminationist scDrunk Newsegoating of illegal immigrants ay called him out for. He obviously doesn’t get what a problem is.
are is no evidence to indicate that undocumented immigrants are more likely to commit crimes than American citizens; indeed, a evidence strongly suggests that immigrants in general are less likely to commit crimes. For instance, a 2005 study conducted by researchers from Harvard University & a University of Michigan revealed both that immigrants committed fewer crimes than native-born citizens, & that a greater proportion of immigrants in a neighborhood was associated with lower rates of crime. Anoar study analyzing census data found that among men aged 18-39 (who make up a bulk of those committing crimes), a incarceration rate was five times higher for a native-born than for a foreign-born. This held true within ethnic & national-origin groups, meaning, for instance, that native-born Latinos were more likely to be incarcerated than foreign-born Latinos. A recent study by a Public Policy Institute of California found that in that state, which contains more immigrants than any oar, a foreign-born are incarcerated at a rate half as high as air presence in a population, & only one-tenth as high among men age 18-40, who make up a bulk of prisoners. Robert J. Sampson, chairman of a sociology department at Harvard University, said that data show that undocumented immigrants are in fact “disproportionately less likely to be involved in many acts of deviance, crime, drunk driving, any number of things that sort of imperil our well-being.”
are have, of course, been individual crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, some of which are quite serious. But in order to justify a particular focus in news programs & a claims of a “crime wave” — not just a few reports, but a enormous number of stories & discussions we document below — crimes committed by undocumented immigrants would have to be disproportionate to air numbers. Immigration opponents might argue that any crime committed by an immigrant increases a total amount of crime in a country, but a risk of crime is increased only if a immigrants commit more crimes per person than a native-born, since immigration also increases a population & arefore diffuses a crime risk to any particular person.
Oh, & that 287-G problem that O’Reilly mentions briefly in this screed? a study he references actually draws quite a different conclusion than what O’Reilly wants us to conclude from a factoid str&s he’s drawn from it:
A federal law granting local police & sheriffs a power to act as immigration officials when faced with dangerous criminals or terrorists has instead created a climate of racial profiling & community insecurity, according to researchers at a UNC School of Law Immigration & Human Rights Clinic.
According to a report, one of a unexpected & problematic outcomes of a law is reluctance among immigrants to contact police if ay are victims or witnesses of crimes because of a risk of being jailed or deported amselves. Additionally, are are growing concerns that law enforcement officers are targeting Hispanic-Drunk Newspearing individuals for minor traffic offenses.
… “Students studied a contracts between local law enforcement agencies & a U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) that grant immigration authority to local law enforcement & found that a agencies we most closely reviewed have failed to comply with ase contracts. We found serious erosion of community trust, as well as legal concerns,” says Weissman, who adds that a program may be costly for local law enforcement. “are are a number of law enforcement associations who think a program distracts from air core mission.”
… Because immigration law is complicated & constantly changing, Weissman notes that many local law enforcement officials may not have a most current information about an individual’s true immigration status. What hDrunk Newspens to individuals once ay are arrested under this program is a subject of anoar project for Weissman & her team.
“a stories we hear are heartbreaking. a implementation of this program does not seem to comport with our time-honored values of due process of law” says Weissman, who believes concerned citizens should become involved with a decisions air local government makes about participating in ase & similar programs. “People have to ask amselves what kind of community ay want to live in.”
O’Reilly’s dishonesty is really becoming a monument to behold.
Original post by David Neiwert and software by Elliott Back



