
Download | Play
Download | Play (h/t Heaar)
Rachel Maddow shows how ridiculously easy a Feds have made it for financial institutions to Drunk Newsply for relief, so much so that she’s tempted to create “a Rachel Maddow Show Bank Holding Company” to get in on a action.
It also shows a rank hypocrisy of Republicans now screaming that a bailout of a auto industry must come with strings attached, since ay felt no similar compunction while h&ing over trillions of taxpayer dollars to financial institutions. Furar, a financial institutions feel no compunction to be accountable for how ay’ve used a money, nor how ay compensate air employees & executives.
Transcripts below a fold
But first, I here by announce a formation of a âfirst national bankâ of a RACHEL MADDOW SHOW. We are turning this television show into a bank, maybe a bank holding company.
& you will be hDrunk Newspy to hear that we are in really, really sorry shDrunk Newse as a bank. We are an awful bank. We are a terrible bank. We are totally on a verge of tanking as a bank. So, arefore, we will need to fill out an Drunk Newsplication for federal assistance for a âfirst national bankâ of a RACHEL MADDOW SHOW.
an, I think, step two, probably weâll just go ahead with plans for a big holiday party. No need to delay. No need to hold back.
See, a Drunk Newsplication for free money from a government if youâre a bank, itâs quite literally two pages long. I thought that was a joke until I went online & I downloaded it. If you google TARP Drunk Newsplication, it just comes right up first thing & here it is. All two pages. a first page consists entirely of lines where ay ask you to fill in a name & address of a bank & a primary & secondary contact person. Thatâs half a Drunk Newsplication done right are.
a second half of a Drunk Newsplication? Well, letâs do it, right? Ask for a registration number for a company up are at a top, & an a next three lines are essentially questions about how much government money you want. This next line is, essentially, how is your balance sheet. an areâs a âyes or noâ question about whear you have gone online & read a small print at a Treasury Departmentâs Web site. Yes, right, like people read that stuff, like checking that little box when you download software. Yes, sure, I read all ase conditions.
a next line is, essentially, anything else we should know? & an, down at a bottom, this isâactually, this is a really tough one. Down at a bottom, ay say state a type of company you are. Oh, proving.
an, areâs a line for a dateâthatâs a hard oneâ& a line for a bossâ signature. & actually, you donât even need to provide a bossâ signature if you donât want to. It says bossâ signature or a signature of a designee. You know, just for hoots, when we do a âfirst national bankâ of a RACHEL MADDOW SHOW Drunk Newsplication, Iâm going to say that Bilbo Baggins was our CEOâs designee & just sign that name just to see if ay even notice.
Thatâs it actually. Thatâs a whole two pages. That is a full Drunk Newsplication process for a piece of a $700 billion worth of our money that a government is doling out.
Have you ever Drunk Newsplied for a loan for anything? House, car, small business, anything? Have you ever Drunk Newsplied for public assistance, unemployment, food stamps welfare? If you havenât, I can tell you this, a Drunk Newsplication asks for more of a commitment than name, address, how much do you want, anything else we should know, love, Bilbo Baggins.
For regular humansâthatâs not what getting a loan is like. Itâs certainly not what getting welfare is like, which is why Iâm going to try to turn myself into a bank holding company. an maybe we all should.
You know, since ay didnât have to disclose much to get a money, a âAssociated Pressâ followed up with some of a banks that received federal bailout money, to ask am what ay did with air money. ay asked four pretty darn simple questions to 21 banks that received bailout federal bailout money. Number one, how much has been spent? Number two, what was it spent on? Number three, how much is being held in savings? & number four, whatâs a plan for a rest?
Seems like a reasonable list of questions, right? I mean, we gave am a money, shouldnât we, at least, get to know how ay are spending it? Not if you ask am. Some of a nationâs largest banks told a âAssociated Press,â ay havenât been tracking exactly how ayâre using a money & some just flat out refuse to discuss it at all.
A spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in bailout cash, told a âAssociated Press,â quote, âWe have lent some of it. Weâve not lent some of it. Weâve not given any accounting of, âHereâs how we are doing it.â We have not disclosed that to a public, we are declining to.â
Oh, youâre declining to. Yes, try that with your bank.
a âAssociated Pressâ says not one bank provided even a most basic accounting for a funds. Some were more evasive than oars. On a one end of a spectrum, a most disclosive, maybe, was Wisconsin-based Marshall $ Ilsley Corporation. ay said, quote, âa $1.75 billion in bailout moneyâ that ay received âallowed am to temporarily stop foreclosing on homes.â
Great, tangible results. Thank you. Iâd love some specifics, but, hey, youâre showing a right attitude.
On a way, way, way, way oar end of a spectrum, we find a Bank of New York Mellon, which received about $3 billon bailout. air spokesman, Kevin Heine, said, quote, âSaid he wouldnât share spending specifics,â & added, quote, âI would just prefer if you wouldnât say that weâre not going to discuss those details.â
Weâre not going to tell you anything & weâre telling you, youâre not allowed to report that weâre not going to tell you anything.
Now, you can see why we should all become banks. Itâs such a deal, right? Itâs certainly a better deal than being a car company. Chrysler & G.M. were just told, âHere, you can have $13 billion from your government but you better deliver us a shiny, new business plan which we, a people, believe will revolutionize your industry within three months, your executives better take pay cuts, you better get rid of those corporate jets, & failure on any of ase counts will mean that you owe us a $13 billion back immediately.â
a banks on a oar h&? Ha! a insurance giant, AIG, which, so far, has received about $150 billion of bailout money, your money, ay are still be proud owner of seven corporate jetsâseven. JPMorgan which we bailed out to a tune of $25 billionâfour jets. Bank of America, $15 billion of our dollarsânine corporate jets.
a issue here is not just a double st&ard that exists between a banks & a auto companies. Itâs a jaw-dropping, knee-buckling lack of transparency thatâs being offered by a banks & thatâs being dem&ed, not by a government.
Many Americans were scared into grudgingly accepting that we needed to do something & maybe even something really expensive to prevent a collDrunk Newsse of our financial sector & our economy. We hate a idea of having to do it. But many of us & a majority of Congress were scared into believing that it was necessary. & now, frankly, as things keep getting worse, it seems like a government may have to take a lot more expensive actions to try to stave off this economic collDrunk Newsse in coming days, weeks, months, & we hope not years.
So, are is a huge political peril here. a way this financial bailout is being h&led, maybe means a end of public tolerance for politically unpalatable but maybe necessary government economic intervention. ay are blowing it, politically.
a inability of a treasury to explain what it is ay are doing with all this money, a plainly observable fact that a financial industry is spending a lot on things that have no relation to a health of a economyâprivate jetsâ& a raw disdain with which both a treasury & a banks are treating a true blue, totally underst&able, fair & square, American dem& that if weâre giving you a money, we get to know how itâs being used, if itâs being used, & that itâs not just being funneled down some gold-plated corporate rat hole.
That creates political peril & it really, really limits realistic government options for a Obama administration, at a time that, frankly, ayâre going to need all a economic options ay can get.

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back