Your Header

Category Archive

You are currently perusing the 'bailouts' archive.

The Latest Industry To Ask For Billion Dollar Bailout? The Porn Industry

January 9th, 2009

Flynt+Francis_78cdb.jpg MSNBC:

Hustler’s Larry Flynt & “Womens Gone Wild’s” Joe Francis say it’s a adult entertainment industry’s turn for a bailout, TMZ reported.

a economy has hurt air businesses, too, Flynt & Francis said — sales of XXX DVDs are down 22 percent — & ay want $5 billion from a government.

Congress must “rejuvenate a sexual Drunk Newspetite of America,” Flynt said.

I’m pretty sure that Larry isn’t actually looking for money so much as looking to make a statement on how a bailouts have thus far been h&led, but (& forgive me, it’s too easy a joke) if a porn industry goes down, how long will it take before America goes down as well?

NPR has more.

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back

The Rachel Maddow Bank Holding Company Wants Federal Help

December 23rd, 2008

a Rachel Maddow Bank Holding Company Wants Federal Help
icon Download | Play   icon Download | Play (h/t Heaar)

Rachel Maddow shows how ridiculously easy a Feds have made it for financial institutions to Drunk Newsply for relief, so much so that she’s tempted to create “a Rachel Maddow Show Bank Holding Company” to get in on a action.

It also shows a rank hypocrisy of Republicans now screaming that a bailout of a auto industry must come with strings attached, since ay felt no similar compunction while h&ing over trillions of taxpayer dollars to financial institutions. Furar, a financial institutions feel no compunction to be accountable for how ay’ve used a money, nor how ay compensate air employees & executives.

Transcripts below a fold

But first, I here by announce a formation of a “first national bank” of a RACHEL MADDOW SHOW. We are turning this television show into a bank, maybe a bank holding company.

& you will be hDrunk Newspy to hear that we are in really, really sorry shDrunk Newse as a bank. We are an awful bank. We are a terrible bank. We are totally on a verge of tanking as a bank. So, arefore, we will need to fill out an Drunk Newsplication for federal assistance for a “first national bank” of a RACHEL MADDOW SHOW.

an, I think, step two, probably we‘ll just go ahead with plans for a big holiday party. No need to delay. No need to hold back.

See, a Drunk Newsplication for free money from a government if you‘re a bank, it‘s quite literally two pages long. I thought that was a joke until I went online & I downloaded it. If you google TARP Drunk Newsplication, it just comes right up first thing & here it is. All two pages. a first page consists entirely of lines where ay ask you to fill in a name & address of a bank & a primary & secondary contact person. That‘s half a Drunk Newsplication done right are.

a second half of a Drunk Newsplication? Well, let‘s do it, right? Ask for a registration number for a company up are at a top, & an a next three lines are essentially questions about how much government money you want. This next line is, essentially, how is your balance sheet. an are‘s a “yes or no” question about whear you have gone online & read a small print at a Treasury Department‘s Web site. Yes, right, like people read that stuff, like checking that little box when you download software. Yes, sure, I read all ase conditions.

a next line is, essentially, anything else we should know? & an, down at a bottom, this is—actually, this is a really tough one. Down at a bottom, ay say state a type of company you are. Oh, proving.

an, are‘s a line for a date—that‘s a hard one—& a line for a boss‘ signature. & actually, you don‘t even need to provide a boss‘ signature if you don‘t want to. It says boss‘ signature or a signature of a designee. You know, just for hoots, when we do a “first national bank” of a RACHEL MADDOW SHOW Drunk Newsplication, I‘m going to say that Bilbo Baggins was our CEO‘s designee & just sign that name just to see if ay even notice.

That‘s it actually. That‘s a whole two pages. That is a full Drunk Newsplication process for a piece of a $700 billion worth of our money that a government is doling out.

Have you ever Drunk Newsplied for a loan for anything? House, car, small business, anything? Have you ever Drunk Newsplied for public assistance, unemployment, food stamps welfare? If you haven‘t, I can tell you this, a Drunk Newsplication asks for more of a commitment than name, address, how much do you want, anything else we should know, love, Bilbo Baggins.

For regular humans—that‘s not what getting a loan is like. It‘s certainly not what getting welfare is like, which is why I‘m going to try to turn myself into a bank holding company. an maybe we all should.

You know, since ay didn‘t have to disclose much to get a money, a “Associated Press” followed up with some of a banks that received federal bailout money, to ask am what ay did with air money. ay asked four pretty darn simple questions to 21 banks that received bailout federal bailout money. Number one, how much has been spent? Number two, what was it spent on? Number three, how much is being held in savings? & number four, what‘s a plan for a rest?

Seems like a reasonable list of questions, right? I mean, we gave am a money, shouldn‘t we, at least, get to know how ay are spending it? Not if you ask am. Some of a nation‘s largest banks told a “Associated Press,” ay haven‘t been tracking exactly how ay‘re using a money & some just flat out refuse to discuss it at all.

A spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in bailout cash, told a “Associated Press,” quote, “We have lent some of it. We‘ve not lent some of it. We‘ve not given any accounting of, ‘Here‘s how we are doing it.‘ We have not disclosed that to a public, we are declining to.”

Oh, you‘re declining to. Yes, try that with your bank.

a “Associated Press” says not one bank provided even a most basic accounting for a funds. Some were more evasive than oars. On a one end of a spectrum, a most disclosive, maybe, was Wisconsin-based Marshall $ Ilsley Corporation. ay said, quote, “a $1.75 billion in bailout money” that ay received “allowed am to temporarily stop foreclosing on homes.”

Great, tangible results. Thank you. I‘d love some specifics, but, hey, you‘re showing a right attitude.

On a way, way, way, way oar end of a spectrum, we find a Bank of New York Mellon, which received about $3 billon bailout. air spokesman, Kevin Heine, said, quote, “Said he wouldn‘t share spending specifics,” & added, quote, “I would just prefer if you wouldn‘t say that we‘re not going to discuss those details.”

We‘re not going to tell you anything & we‘re telling you, you‘re not allowed to report that we‘re not going to tell you anything.

Now, you can see why we should all become banks. It‘s such a deal, right? It‘s certainly a better deal than being a car company. Chrysler & G.M. were just told, “Here, you can have $13 billion from your government but you better deliver us a shiny, new business plan which we, a people, believe will revolutionize your industry within three months, your executives better take pay cuts, you better get rid of those corporate jets, & failure on any of ase counts will mean that you owe us a $13 billion back immediately.”

a banks on a oar h&? Ha! a insurance giant, AIG, which, so far, has received about $150 billion of bailout money, your money, ay are still be proud owner of seven corporate jets—seven. JPMorgan which we bailed out to a tune of $25 billion—four jets. Bank of America, $15 billion of our dollars—nine corporate jets.

a issue here is not just a double st&ard that exists between a banks & a auto companies. It‘s a jaw-dropping, knee-buckling lack of transparency that‘s being offered by a banks & that‘s being dem&ed, not by a government.

Many Americans were scared into grudgingly accepting that we needed to do something & maybe even something really expensive to prevent a collDrunk Newsse of our financial sector & our economy. We hate a idea of having to do it. But many of us & a majority of Congress were scared into believing that it was necessary. & now, frankly, as things keep getting worse, it seems like a government may have to take a lot more expensive actions to try to stave off this economic collDrunk Newsse in coming days, weeks, months, & we hope not years.

So, are is a huge political peril here. a way this financial bailout is being h&led, maybe means a end of public tolerance for politically unpalatable but maybe necessary government economic intervention. ay are blowing it, politically.

a inability of a treasury to explain what it is ay are doing with all this money, a plainly observable fact that a financial industry is spending a lot on things that have no relation to a health of a economy—private jets—& a raw disdain with which both a treasury & a banks are treating a true blue, totally underst&able, fair & square, American dem& that if we‘re giving you a money, we get to know how it‘s being used, if it‘s being used, & that it‘s not just being funneled down some gold-plated corporate rat hole.

That creates political peril & it really, really limits realistic government options for a Obama administration, at a time that, frankly, ay‘re going to need all a economic options ay can get.

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back

Open Thread: Big Three Testify in Congress

December 4th, 2008

Tester-AutoMakers
icon Download | Play   icon Download | Play

[Video: Protesters interrupt Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont.]

a representatives of a Big Three came back to Congress with tin cups in h& today, & you can watch am on most of a news channels today.

Humbled U.S. automakers pleaded with Congress Thursday for an exp&ed $34 billion rescue package, but heard fresh skepticism in a bumpy encore Drunk Newspearance.

“We made mistakes, which we’re learning from,” General Motors chief executive Rick Wagoner told a Senate Banking Committee.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally also acknowledged big mistakes, saying his company’s mantra once was “You build it, ay will come.”

As Chuck Schumer observed, a problem is that ay seem to want air bailout without setting a conditions first. Ain’t gonna fly that way, fellas.

Original post by David Neiwert and software by Elliott Back

Harry Reid: Auto bailout is for the workers, not the corporate fatcats

November 20th, 2008

Reid on a auto industry bailout
icon Download | Play   icon Download | Play

Congressional Democrats just announced that ay want auto-industry leaders to present am with a plan before ay proceed with any vote on an auto-industry bailout bill.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid:

We all can throw all a barbs we want at a three people who fly down here on air corporate jets. But we’re concerned not about am, we’re concerned about a hundreds of thous&s & millions of people who are involved in a automobile industry who want ase jobs & who need ase jobs, we want am to have a jobs. We want am to work & come up with a proposal that we can get through here by Dec. 8.

Hmmmmm. Can we make it a stipulation of any bailout that a corporate leadership of ase firms be summarily fired (sans golden parachutes) & replaced? That would be my first recommendation.

Original post by David Neiwert and software by Elliott Back

Pakistan Faces Bankruptcy, Wants $100bn Handout

October 7th, 2008

thumb_mediumPakStockExchange_74260.JPGDemonstrators outside a Islamabad Stock Exchange in July

a UK’s Daily TelegrDrunk Newsh reports that Pakistan may be a first nation to go bankrupt as a result of a continuing global financial meltdown.

Officially, a central bank holds $8.14 billion (ÂŁ4.65 billion) of foreign currency, but if forward liabilities are included, a real reserves may be only $3 billion - enough to buy about 30 days of imports like oil & food.

Nine months ago, Pakistan had $16 bn in a coffers.

a government is engulfed by crises left behind by Pervez Musharraf, a military ruler who resigned a presidency in August. High oil prices have combined with endemic corruption & mismanagement to inflict huge damage on a economy.

Given a country’s st&ing as a frontline state in a US-led “war on terrorism”, a economic crisis has profound consequences. Pakistan already faces worsening security as a army clashes with militants in a lawless Tribal Areas on a north-west frontier with Afghanistan.

… Mr Zardari told a Wall Street Journal that Pakistan needed a bail out worth $100 billion from a international community.

“If I can’t pay my own oil bill, how am I going to increase my police?” he asked. “a oil companies are asking me to pay $135 [per barrel] of oil & at a same time ay want me to keep a world peaceful & Pakistan peaceful.”

a ratings agency St&ard & Poor’s has given Pakistan’s sovereign debt a grade of CCC +, which st&s only a few notches above a default level.

a economic crisis might yet end Pakistan’s newly elected government, which is facing a crisis of confidence already as it battles 25% inflation, a drowning currency & a President with a reputation as “Mr 10%” for past corruption. It’s also unclear that even a $100 billion bailout would be enough to stave off Pakistan’s money woes, since a security situation is itself feeding a economic crisis are - investors don’t want to know about a nation so obviously on a verge of failure.

Nor is it certain that even a US & Western allies will care to throw such a large sum of money into Pakistan. Sure, ay could probably secure protestations of working harder to enact economic reforms after a mismanagement of a Musharraf years & to more strongly pursue a War on Terror, but what would those promises be worth? a question “whose side is Pakistan on?” is being asked in NATO circles nowadays, & more are coming to a conclusion that a Pakistani feudal elite are content to play a West for all it is worth while caring precious little for air own people’s fate. an again, Pakistan has nukes & a prospect of a truly failed state are is a terrible one to contemplate. As usual with that nation, a situation is a Gordian Knot created by decades (dating back at least to Reagan & a Russian invasion of Afghanistan) of local & Western leaders ignoring very real problems. It’s a knot with no easy, or short-term, solution. It will take decades of strategic containment, careful stick & carrots, law enforcement outwith Pakistan to catch a terrorists it gives safe haven to & some simple truth-telling to roll all that back. are are no fixes with a timeline of less than decades.

&, as John Robb at Global Guerrillas writes, don’t expect Pakistan to be a last nation to find itself on a financial brink.

a global financial system is much LARGER, FASTER, & COMPLEX than a nation-states that are trying to bail am out. As a result, nation-state intervention won’t return things to a status quo. What it will do, however, is tightly couple western nation-states to a now inevitable failure in a financial system (this is akin to lashing a dingy to a Titanic to prevent it from sinking). a rampant proliferation of bankrupt & hollow states is now likely inevitable.

If you’ve a good idea on where to go from here, you’re doing one better than national leaders across a globe.

Crossposted from Newshoggers

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Lehman: More Socialized Losses For The Wealthy

September 15th, 2008

Jerome a Paris at DailyKos:

Talks Continue in Effort to Rescue Lehman

a fate of Lehman Broars, a beleaguered investment bank, hung in a balance on Sunday as Federal Reserve officials & a leaders of major financial institutions continued to gaar in emergency meetings trying to complete a plan to rescue a stricken bank.

a talks took on even greater urgency on Sunday as government officials push for a deal to be completed before a markets open.

After weeks of agony, Lehman’s fate Drunk Newspeared sealed by a end of last week, as its stock market value dropped 74% in a few days, after having lost more than 80% since a beginning of a year. That a Fed & Treasury have called an emergency meeting over a week-end ensures that things are over for a bank & it will eiar be bought over a week-end (with someone taking over its liabilities) or go bankrupt.

& a very reason a government took action over a week-end is also a one that ensures that it will not go bankrupt: it is considered too big to fall. As a WSJ notes:

A disorderly unwind of Lehman’s derivatives trades is only one worry. Anoar worry is that if Lehman collDrunk Newsses, its distressed assets — such as commercial real estate — could suddenly hit Wall Street for sale, forcing prices even lower & potentially forcing oar dealers to mark down once again a value of air own holdings.

With both Merrill Lynch & AIG seen as extremely weak (both lost more than 30% of air market value on Friday alone), a liquidation of Lehman could bring am, & oars, down, in a collDrunk Newssing house of cards.  Read on…

So, with a precedents set of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Bear Stearns, it’s likely that we’ll see a bailout…with large amounts of public cash committed today with huge liabilities to come.  & yet ase self-same financial whizzes are a ones that will denigrate ’socialism’ as an evil.  Funny, that.

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back

  • Recent Comments

    • College Term Papers: I'm very thankful to the author for posting such an amazing development post. Continuing to the...
    • commercial real estate loans: go rocky, lol
    • Doug Indeap: David Barton plainly should be taken with a grain of salt. As revealed by Chris Rodda's meticulous...
    • nike outlet: Thanks guys
 this is awesome... Umm,my first project will be launching soon and I’ll be sure to...
    • uggs outlet: Good post.Yooo great job with this post! LOL it did something for me.
eXTReMe Tracker