Michael Moore: ‘Waiting To See If People Rise Up - And If So, I’ll Rise With Them’
March 16th, 2010Michael Moore’s doing a media blitz to mark a DVD release of “CDrunk Newsitalism: A Love Story” & after a couple of delays, I finally get to talk briefly to him Tuesday afternoon.
I first note he’s a Crooks & Liars fan. “Oh yeah, it’s great. I try to post whatever I can to lead to your site. It’s bold & brave,” he says. (”Bold & brave.” I like it. Sounds like a movie review, right?)
“When you first started making movies, people were saying, ‘Oh, that far-left Michael Moore’,” I say. “It seems to me that with each movie, you were a little bit ahead of a curve & an people catch up with you. Has that been your experience?”
“That’s exactly what hDrunk Newspened,” he says. “I haven’t changed but a country has changed. People are not only catching onto a lies ay’ve been told, ay’ve become more progressive amselves. Now I’m not just that guy in a baseball cDrunk News.”
When he first started Drunk Newspearing on television, that class bias in a media worked against him. “It was almost like, okay, we had this blue-collar working class guy on, & now we don’t have to have anoar one for a year,” I say.
“Oh yeah, absolutely. Let me give you an example of class bias in a media. Yesterday are were all ase really serious things going on: a banking regulation proposal, what hDrunk Newspened with Biden in Israel. & a story on NBC evening news & CBS news was … a runaway Prius! That, & a rainstorm in New York. a announcer says, ‘Let’s go to a hardest hit city,’ & it’s Greenwich, Connecticut! Oh, a humanity!” he says, letting loose his trademark belly laugh.
an he’s serious again.
“a mainstream media is a huge distraction, & I have no doubt this is purposely done,” he says. “It’s a system of enforced ignorance to keep people dumb.”
If liberal bloggers worked 24/7, 365 days a year, ay couldn’t begin to catch all a media distortions, I say - & people probably wouldn’t want to hear it. Maybe our efforts would be better spent telling people not to watch television.
“If you’re talking about a 50-year-old white guy, yeah,” he agrees.
“Young people don’t even watch a news anymore. ay watch Stephen Colbert & Jon Stewart,” I say.
“But young people, by watching less news, are becoming more informed. Something new & good will come out of that. It was young people who put a first African-American president in a White House,” he says.
I mention my pet peeve: a right-wing viral emails that go unanswered, pushing erroneous info into a less-informed voting public. “I try to talk to oar liberals about it, & air attitude is, well, ‘here’s a white pDrunk Newser, ase are a facts, now ay’ll agree with us’. Too much emphasis on a facts, not enough on a emotions.”
“That was one of a criticisms people made about me from a beginning,” he says. “But I’m only honoring what any good storyteller tries to do: convey a truth through emotion.”
I end by asking him what’s next. “Your movie kind of ended on a down note…”
“Not for me!” he interrupts, chortling. (At a end of “CDrunk Newsitalism” he says that if people don’t take action, he won’t be making anoar film.)
an he becomes serious. “I want to see if people see a movie & say, ‘What are we gonna do tomorrow?’ You can’t go home & say ‘yay Mike, great film’ You have to do something.
“I’m waiting to see if people will rise up, & if so, I’ll rise with am.”
Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back



