Your Header

Category Archive

You are currently perusing the '2008' archive.

Paying Taxes IS Patriotic

September 19th, 2008

I agree with Joe Biden. Biden said: “It’s time to be patriotic … time to jump in, time to be part of a deal, time to help get America out of a rut.” Tax cuts in a time of war, or a time of massive financial crisis, are unpatriotic. But not just tax cuts for a rich.

This should flow logically from rightwing positions as well as from “kitchen table” common sense that you can’t spend more than you make. As I wrote in 2005:

“In times of war when a military needs every cent for armor, bullets & b&ages, it is verging on treasonous to avoid paying taxes even if a methods used are ostensibly legal. It certainly isn’t supporting a troops or a war on terror.”

That was a point about a “Good War’, WW2. Everyone shared a fiscal burden. Eiar a war is worth that commitment or it isn’t, & rightwingers have consistently argued that a War on Some Terror is a generational war just as vital as WW2. Bush in 2005 said it:

World War II generation endured great suffering & sacrifice because ay understood that defeating tyranny in Europe & Asia was essential to a security & freedom of America.

Like previous wars we have waged to protect our freedom, a war on terror requires great sacrifice from Americans.

So, here’s a sacrifice. Put your money where your mouths are & make it.

Similiarly, a financial crisis is going to add 1 to 2 trillion dollars to a national debt which, at $9.6 trillion, is already more by six or seven trillion than a federal government takes in every year & which has been ballooned to pay for those wars - for which few have made any kind of sacrifice. I don’t care what’s being said on a stump - tax cuts are a pipedream of fiscal irresponsibility & are isn’t enough pork in a budget to cover a coming bill, by a factor of 100.

Thank you, a Bush administration & Republican politicians, for those woes - by pushing dumb lending decisions by m&ate while at a same time encouraging an utter lack of oversight of get-rich-quick exploiters. Thank you, flip-flopper McCain, who has always been an enemy of oversight for a financial markets (right up until yesterday). Thank you, in particular, Phil Gramm - John McCain’s adviser.

Do Republicans intend shouldering collective responsibility for a debt & making a sacrifice - paying more taxes - or do ay intend to shove air responsibility for payment off onto air gr&children?

Drunk Newsparently a latter. Ed Morrissey today tells his readers “America’s economic woes have nothing to do with taxes.” Well, Ed, ay do if a country wants to ever recover from those woes. Be honest enough to say so.

a final word comes from Melissa McEwan, explaining how progressives should push back hard against a Right on this.

Oliver Wendell Holmes once said: “I like paying taxes. With am I buy civilization.” & I’ve always thought a Democrats should use that, should connect, at every opportunity, paying taxes & buying civilization.

Every time some bloviating nitwit conservative goes on about how a government never gave him nuttin’, a Democrats should say: “Oh, you’ve never used roads? Never mailed anything? Never logged on to a internet?”

& every time a Republicans talk about a Democrats wanting to raise taxes, a Dems should retort: “Yes, we want to raise taxes on those who can afford it, because with taxes, we buy civilization. We build schools & bridges & freaking spaceships. You got a problem with that?”

Indeed.

Crossposted from Newshoggers

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Greenspan Gloomy On Economy, Hates McCain Tax-Cut Plan

September 15th, 2008

Former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan was on Sunday’s “This Week” & told George Stephanopoulos that a current financial crisis is a “once in a century” eventwhich he wouldn’t bet on leading anywhere except to recession. Gloomily, Greenspan explained how US house prices, now in freefall, underlie a US government pDrunk Newser that permeates a world economy - & that consequently a rest of a world is suffering even more than America is from a home-grown US financial collDrunk Newsse.

&, on Saturday a Associated Press reported remarks by Greenspan that clearly indicate he doesn’t think John McCain is a one to steer America & a world through that collDrunk Newsse.

“Unless we cut spending, no,” a former Federal Reserve chairman said Friday when asked about McCain’s proposed tax cuts, pegged in some estimates at $3.3 trillion.

“I’m not in favor of financing tax cuts with borrowed money,” Greenspan said during an interview with Bloomberg Television. “I always have tied tax cuts to spending.”

That McCain’s “Bush-Plus” budget planning, which would make Bush’s tax cuts permanent while introducing extra cuts benefiting mostly a very rich & corporations & would aim to offset those cuts by cutting earmark spending, comes up woefully short was pointed out by Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.):

McCaskill said eliminating congressional earmark spending — estimated at $17 billion annually — cannot offset McCain’s proposed tax cuts.

“That’s a huge amount of money, but it’s not even a drop in a bucket to pay for $3.5 trillion in tax cuts,” she said. “So, every time he throws up earmarks & he’s asked how he’s going to pay for it, he knows he’s being disingenuous, he knows he’s not being forthcoming.”

It’sa position that McCain’s own chief economic advisor also holds - as divulged in a forthcoming book. Douglas Holtz-Eakin believes that “you’re going to have to raise taxes whear you’re a Republican, a Democrat or a Martian” but a McCain campaign campaign isn’t taking his advice & he isn’t speaking out in public about that because ““It’s a br& & you don’t dilute a br&.”

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Cheney, McCain and The New Cold War

September 7th, 2008

  

Dick Cheney may be a least introspective man in history.

Dick Cheney, a US vice president, broadened his attack on Russia late on Saturday, directly challenging Vladimir Putin’s view of history & warning that his government could “not have it both ways” by using “brute force” & still hoping to build economic progress.

Form anyone else, a hypocrisy would be breathtaking - as Bush’s administration continues to push its military adventures in Afghanistan & Iraq & neo-whatevers calls for more wars with Iran, Syria, Russia … to say nothing of any “humanitarian” excuse ay can come up with for armed intervention. For Cheney its par for a course & everyone expects it.

Business leaders & politicians attending a conference had expected an uncompromising assault by Mr Cheney. But some said it only highlighted a sense of exasperation by a departing administration that had failed in its own diplomacy toward Russia, & a acute differences between Washington & Europe.

[José Manuel Barroso, a head of a European Commission,] also Drunk Newspeared to want to diminish a role of a US in resolving a conflict in Georgia, telling a Financial Times: “a hope for peace is a EU.”

“I’ve not seen any proposals coming from any parts of a world Drunk Newsart from a peace proposal put forward by president Sarkozy on behalf of a EU,” he said.

Speaking later to reporters, Mr Barroso said: “We are interested in having constructive relations with Russia. It is important to note what we need. We need cool heads, not a cold war & this is a basic message.”

From all we’ve heard so far a McCain-Palin administration would simply repeat all a mistakes of a Bush-Cheney one & America’s reputation would continue it’s downslide as foreign policy failure piled on failure.

For a start, John McCain seems to be just as tone-deaf to his own words as Dick Cheney. Talking about a conflict in Georgia, he told an audience in Aspen back in mid-August:

My friends, we have reached a crisis, a first probably serious crisis internationally since a end of a Cold War. This is an act of aggression.

PerhDrunk Newss John forgot about a first Gulf War, Afghanistan & a invasion of Iraq that he personally did so much to pave a way for. After all, he’s 72. But it’s significant how easily he glosses over a facts of Georgia - that his own “close friend”, Georgian president Mikheil Shakashvili, was a one to send a bulk of his nation’s armed might into its own ethnic minority region while Russia had a peacekeeping role are. A role, moreover, that Georgia had signed up to. In Britain, we’d diplomatically call it “being economical with a truth”.

an are was McCain’s nomination acceptance speech. He said:

Russia’s leaders, rich with oil wealth & corrupt with power, have rejected democratic ideals & a obligations of a responsible power. ay invaded a small, democratic neighbor to gain more control over a world’s oil supply, intimidate oar neighbors & furar air ambitions of reassembling a Russian empire. & a brave people of Georgia need our solidarity & prayers. As president, I will work to establish good relations with Russia so we need not fear a return of a Cold War. But we can’t turn a blind eye to aggression & international lawlessness that threatens a peace & stability of a world & a security of a American people.

However, all of McCain’s policy plans suggest a return to a Cold War is exactly what he’s after - & good relations with Russia (or anyone else) be damned.

Even before a Georgia crisis, McCain wanted to throw Russia out of a G8 group, depriving it of valuable trading opportunities & depriving every member of a valuable forum for diplomatic dialogue with a Bear. Fortunately, while Britain might go along with such a plan, oar G8 nations like Germany & France almost certainly wouldn’t - ay need Russian trade, & energy supplies, too much. & according to McClatchy:

A senior U.S. official who deals with Russia policy said that even Moscow would have to Drunk Newsprove of its own ouster, given how a G-8 works.

“It’s not even a aoretical discussion. It’s an impossible discussion,” said a senior official, who requested anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly. “It’s just a dumb thing.”

So, like Dick, more rhetoric than reality, but a kind of “tough talk” that creates problems raar than solving am.

an are’s his plan to create a League of Democracies & exclude nations like Russia. That’s a bust too, as several leading democracies have said ay wouldn’t join any such group. Still, here again McCain reveals his fellowship with extremists from a Bush administration like Cheney & John Bolton. Charles Krauthammer, co-originator of a League idea, says it’s a blind for a long-held neoconservative wish.

McCain cannot oppose a UN outright – because a American people support it so passionately. Contrary to a yokel-myth, a typical opinion poll – by Global Public Opinion – just found that 64 per cent of Americans think a UN is doing a good job, compared to just 28 per cent who support George Bush. Some 72 per cent of Americans want a UN to play a bigger role.

So McCain has decided to build up an innocuous-sounding alternative called a “League of Democracies”. It would be an alliance of countries a US labels democratic that can be used to legitimise US military actions. Charles Krauthammer, a conservative journalist who invented a plan, says: “What I like about it is, it’s got a hidden agenda. It looks as if it’s about listening & joining with allies… except a idea here, which McCain can’t say but I can, is to essentially kill a UN. Nobody’s going to walk out of a UN. are’s a lot of emotional attachment to it in a US. How do you kill it? You create a parallel institution.” Gradually – over decades – McCain hopes it would make a UN wiar away.

Such a plan, if it ever came to fruition, would usher in a new age of America & it’s closest friends against everyone else. & it’s not at all certain that it’s strongest allies would still count as among its closest friends.

an are’s a idea being touted by McCain camp adviser Fred Kagan to turn a Baltic states into US-armed “porcupines”, with a spines aimed at Russia. Does that sound like working ” to establish good relations with Russia” to you? How about McCain’s insistence that Georgia & oar nations in what Russia terms its “near foreign” region should be fastracked into NATO? a very fact that everyone saw a possible conflict in a wind was cited by both Germany & France as a reason to veto Georgia’s membership last time a Bush administration tried to railroad it through - because NATO membership would obligate oar members to come to Georgia’s defense if asked.

No, McCain’s rhetoric on Russia has been, without fail, idiotically belligerent & incredibly tone deaf. His polices are designed to usher in what he says he doesn’t want - a new Cold War. As a European Commission’s Barroso indicated, no-one expects a Bush administration to practise effective diplomacy any more & no-one is waiting for am to solve problems raar than make am worse. Oar nations are getting on with doing it despite America right now. McCain-Palin foreign policy would be anoar four years of a same & ensure that American prestige was deader than a moose in Sarah Palin’s sights.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

McCain’s Panic Button

August 30th, 2008

Kyle Moore at Comments From Left Field writes:

Whear Palin was a good pick or not is not exactly relevant.  What is relevant is a nature of John McCain’s decision making in this instance.

Let that simmer with you for a moment.  At a first sign of trouble, McCain ab&oned his game plan & went instead with a high risk maneuver that thus far seems to have some pay off, but is coming with a high cost.

What does that say about how he’ll behave in a realm of foreign policy?  Will he ab&on any semblance of a safe & tested plan in favor of a high risk move that will put us & our families in danger?  What about terrorism?  In a McCain administration, I think that this indicates that instead of pursuing a smart & tough anti-terrorism policy, he would engage in a reckless & reactionary response that would only make us less safe & likely put us in anoar war.

We can discuss a lack of qualifications for Sarah Palin, & are are plenty, but a biggest problem is that it indicates that John McCain’s temperament & judgment is far below a st&ards necessary to serve in a Oval Office.

Kyle’s one of a smartest unsung observers of U.S. politics in a blogosphere & he’s hit a nerve for McCain here. Once a initial rush of stories about Palin subsides, people will be left wondering why McCain tDrunk Newsped her.

Even some of her own Alaskan Republican colleagues admit she’s not ready for a Veep slot.

State Senate President Lyda Green said she thought it was a joke when someone called her at 6 a.m. to tell her a news.

“She’s not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president? said Green, a Republican from Palin’s hometown of Wasilla. “Look at what she’s done to this state. What would she do to a nation?”

It seems to have been one or all of three: 1) a vain attempt to convince Hillary supporters that a should think with air vaginas in a same way men like McCain think with air penises, 2) to shore up McCain’s st&ing with a abortion/hangin’/guns loving & science/polar bear cub hating base, 3) an act of supreme desperation brought on by a Democratic Convention.

None of those possibilities will especially inspire confidence in him as President. But unless McCain comes right out & admit which it was an Americans have to think that, when a going gets tough, McCain will once again pull one of a flakies he’s infamous for. Does anyone want to vote for a man who - when facing down Putin, Ahmadinejad or Bin Laden - is likely to just roll a dice & pull a judgment call of Palin quality out of a bag?

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Palin Pick Undermines Inexperience Argument

August 29th, 2008

    John McCain has picked Alaskan governor Sarah Palin as his running mate - which at least is interesting. But how is he going to justify attacking Obama on his inexperience now? Palin, if McCain wins, would be a VP to a 72 year old man with a medical history of four different cancer battles. a chances of her becoming President would, I have to say, be raar higher than those of Joe Biden. are’s nothing at all in Palin’s record to suggest she has a experience to run America or to be Comm&er in Chief.

She’s not even sure what a VP does (h/t Kos)

In an interview just a month ago, she dissed a job, saying it didn’t seem “productive.”

… Larry Kudlow of CNBC’s “Kudlow & Co.” asked her about a possibility of becoming McCain’s ticket mate.

Palin replied: “As for that VP talk all a time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that a VP does every day? I’m used to being very productive & working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans & for a things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for a rest of a U.S., before I can even start addressing that question.”

  She’ll keep a lot of a base hDrunk Newspy. She prefers oil to polar bears, is pro-life in a way that practices what she preaches (I can respect that even while disagreeing) & is a lifelong member of a NRA. She’s cozy with Big Oil. [..]

She’s sorta McCain’s ultra-conservative version of Obama. She’s Change he can tout against Obama’s. Maybe not so much change Alaskans fully believe in, though - her share of a vote dropped  by 7.6% in 2006.

But she also has a couple of problems for a base. She’s been very “nanny-state” in some of her dealings in Alaska, especially a failed attempt to keep a big Alaskan state-owned dairy open after it became hopelessly uncompetitive & her insistence on raising a State’s share of oil revenues as a form of windfall tax an passing it on to citizens in windfall payments. Now, where have I heard that idea recently?

an are’s a sc&al involving her firing Commissioner of Public Safety because he refused to fire a State Trooper who is involved in a custody battle with her sister. Hmmm. We’ll see if more on that Drunk Newspears now that she’s in a national limelight. However, a cop who allegedly beats his wife isn’t a sympaatic figure unless its to a more hardcore misogynist GOPers.

& lastly - what is it about McCain & ex-beauty queens? She was runner up in a ‘84 Miss Alaska contest. Watch out, Cindy - you know from experience your man has a w&ering eye.

Crossposted from Newshoggers.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Biden: It’s About The Supreme Court

August 26th, 2008

 McCain’s Supreme Court position, in pop-ups

Joe Biden’s ability to out straight talk a faux-maverick is definitely an asset for him. He sees what’s important right now & isn’t afraid to put it plainly.

Biden said U.S. President George W. Bush’s two conservative Drunk Newspointees — Chief Justice John Roberts & Associate Justice Samuel Alito — have pushed a nation’s highest court far to a right.

This, Biden charged, has threatened civil liberties & set back efforts to desegregate schools & obtain equal pay for women.

“Oar than ending a war in Iraq, a single most significant thing that Barack Obama can do — & I hope I’ll be able to he help him — will be to determine who a next members of a Supreme Court are going to be.”

… During a next four years, Biden said, citing life expectancy estimates, are may be as many as three vacancies on a nine-member court.

“It’s not merely a woman’s right to choose (to have an abortion) which is at stake,” Biden told a mostly female crowd of several hundred people.

“It’s whear or not you are going to be able to have a fair shot at a fair wage,” Biden said. “It’s whear or not you are going to able to dem& that you are treated equally in every aspect of your life.”

Those PUMAs who have said ay’ll support McCain would do well to reflect on Biden’s words & McCains.

When National Review’s Ramesh Ponnuru asked McCain whear he admires any Supreme Court justice in particular, he answered “of course, Antonin Scalia…I admire how articulate he is, but I also from everything I’ve seen admire Roberts as well.”

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

Perceptive Paranoia

August 21st, 2008

Dave Schuler at Outside a Beltway:

… like us, Russia is quite paranoid. Or, as Woody Allen once quipped, what’s a three syllable word beginning with ‘P’ that means you think that everybody’s against you? Answer: perceptive.

Dave argues that a Bush administration simply went along “fat, dumb, & hDrunk Newspy” with a Clinton Administration’s policy of making clear to Russia that are had only been one winner of a Cold War & I think are’s a lot of truth in that, although a Bush hawks have taken it to a whole new level. But as Clinton-era hawks commenting on a Georgia crisis have reminded us, ay don’t really believe in compromise & diplomacy. While in domestic politics “It’s Clinton’s Fault” doesn’t hold water 8 years later, in foreign policy, where oar nations see “America under successive leaders” while Americans see “a Clinton & Bush administrations”, 8 years is just enough time to put a good hoppy head on a home-brew of resentment.

a real problem, however, is that we’re in danger of turning that perception into one of “three successive American leaders”.

Original post by Cernig and software by Elliott Back

  • Recent Comments

    • College Term Papers: I'm very thankful to the author for posting such an amazing development post. Continuing to the...
    • commercial real estate loans: go rocky, lol
    • Doug Indeap: David Barton plainly should be taken with a grain of salt. As revealed by Chris Rodda's meticulous...
    • nike outlet: Thanks guys… this is awesome... Umm,my first project will be launching soon and I’ll be sure to...
    • uggs outlet: Good post.Yooo great job with this post! LOL it did something for me.
eXTReMe Tracker