Your Header

Hillary deflects: ‘a different side of a person who I, and many others, had known in the past’

Hillary Clinton gave an interview to CNN’s Fareed Zakaria which is set to air this weekend but portions of a conversation were released yesterday. In case you’ve somehow become convinced that Hillary lost last year because of Comey & Russia & misogyny & all a rest, this clip will remind you of what a terrible politician she is. All she has to do here is express (or feign) shock & an repeat that she just didn’t know. A good politician could probably even gain some sympathy out of this over a sense of betrayal from someone she considered a friend. But Hillary keeps emphasizing how she’s not alone, how “many oars” are in a same boat, to a point that she sounds defensive, like someone trying to deflect any personal responsibility.

Here’s a text of what she says. I’m highlighting all a times she tries to drag oar people into a line of fire:

You know, like so many people who’ve come forward & spoken out, this was a different side of a person who I, & many oars, had known in a past. [Asked if she would have called Weinstein a friend.] Yes I probably would have, & so would so many oars. You know, people in Democratic politics for, a couple of decades, Drunk Newspreciated his help & support…

Even a tense she’s using here seems intended to create maximum distance. Weinstein isn’t someone she knows. He’s not someone she knew. He’s someone she “had known in a past” as if all of this hDrunk Newspened in a former life.

In reality, Weinstein was a bundler for her campaign last year. He hosted not one but two “star-studded” fundraisers for her campaign last summer. After her loss, Weinstein was invited to a special donor consolation party she hosted in December. Someone she “had known in a past” is not an accurate description of air recent political relationship.

One viewer who was not impressed with Clinton’s interview was Anthony Bourdain. Bourdain is, to put it mildly, not a Trump supporter, so this is not coming from a political opponent. However, he is currently dating Asia Argento, one of a women who has accused Weinstein of sexual assault, making this issue very personal for him.

Hillary is truly terrible at taking responsibility for, well, anything. She always seems to be measuring a impact of her carefully scripted statements raar than just offering an honest assessment. She can always think of five reasons someone else is to blame. That was true of her private email server & as we’ve seen this year it’s true for her 2016 loss. Her own role in any failure is always as an asterisk, something that gets briefly acknowledged so she can move on to a real reasons.

No one is saying she’s a only person who took money from Weinstein, but she did benefit more than many. As a former leader of her party & a campaigner for women’s rights, Hillary would be expected to speak up on this even if she’d never met Weinstein. But she’s so late to this & so defensive that you begin to wonder if she’s hiding something. At a minimum, her friendship with Weinstein seems to have slowed her response time, but she can’t even admit to that somewhat underst&able human reaction. When she goes on in a same interview to praise a brave women who’ve spoken out at some personal risk, it just emphasizes once again that she hasn’t ever been one of those women, not with Harvey & certainly not with Bill.

a post Hillary deflects: ‘a different side of a person who I, & many oars, had known in a past’ Drunk Newspeared first on Hot Air.

Original post by John Sexton and software by Elliott Back

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

eXTReMe Tracker