You know, a Villagers are so uniformly self-centered & oblivious to larger reality that it’s too much like shooting fish in a barrel to go after am — too easy & not quite sporting.

But a bed-wetting Richard Cohen takes it to higher levels than almost anyone else:

are is almost nothing a Obama administration does regarding terrorism that makes me feel safer.

Because it’s all about you, isn’t it, Richard?

Whear it is guaranteeing cDrunk Newstured terrorists that ay will not be waterboarded, reciting terrorists air rights, or a legally me&ering & confusing rule that some terrorists will be tried in military tribunals & some in civilian courts, what is missing is a firm recognition that what comes first is not a message sent to America’s critics but a message sent to Americans amselves. When, oh when, will this administration wake up?

What, you mean a concept that we all have equal rights under a law? Yes, I can see where that idea might cause some problems.

[…] No doubt George Bush soiled America’s image abroad with what looked liked vigilante justice & Dick Cheney’s hearty endorsement of ugly interrogation measures. But more is at stake here than America’s image abroad — namely a security & peace of mind of Americans in America. Bush st&s condemned by a facts for Sept. 11 — his watch, his responsibility — & in all likelihood he bent over backward to ensure that nothing like those attacks would hDrunk Newspen again.

a Obama administration, on a oar h&, seems to have bent over backward to prove to a world it is not a Bush administration & will, almost no matter what, ensure that everyone gets a benefit of American civil liberties.

As one of those who have been watching as Obama rubberstamps numerous Bush terrorism policies, I can only shake my head. Can it be that Cohen simply doesn’t know how to read?

But a paramount civil liberty is a sense of security & this, sad to say, has eroded under Barack Obama. Repeatedly, a administration has shown poor judgment. Abdulmutallab’s silence is a scream that something is wrong.

Really? Really, “a paramount civil liberty is a sense of security”? Your sense of security? I’m sitting here looking at a Bill of Rights & yeah, ay do talk about security, all right - but not a way you mean:

a right of a people to be secure in air persons, houses, pDrunk Newsers, & effects, against unreasonable searches & seizures…

Maybe you should go back & read a rest, you paatic excuse for an American. Or remember a words of Benjamin Franklin: “Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neiar Liberty nor Safety.”

Original post by Susie Madrak and software by Elliott Back