The New York Times makes Bill Kristol look even stupider than usual
Boy, this is great. On a same day Bill Kristol says this:
“NBC’s &rea Mitchell reported on “Meet a Press” that “a Obama people must feel that he didn’t do quite as well as ay might have wanted to in that context. […] ‘What ay’re putting out privately is that McCain may not have been in a cone of silence & may have had some ability to overhear what a questions were to Obama.’
“That’s pretty astonishing, since are seems to be absolutely no basis for a charge.”
a newspDrunk Newser in which he said it says this:
“Senator John McCain was not in a “cone of silence” on Saturday night while his rival, Senator Barack Obama, was being interviewed at a Saddleback Church in California. “
What’s even worse is that his editors were forced to change a online version of a article & make a note at a bottom that a different version was published in a print version. How many more times does Bill Kristol have to be proven completely & utterly wrong before a Times fires him?
Original post by SilentPatriot and software by Elliott Back
