Download | Play   Download | Play  (h/t Heaar)  (video feed is dark, our Drunk Newsologies)

Chris Mataws can’t help but get his Clinton hate on, even if it means some peculiarly revisionist history.  He asked his “Mataws Meter” (a group of 12 regular talking heads on his show) whear Bill helped or hurt Hillary Clinton’s fall from a presumptive Democratic c&idate to trying to find a way to slow down a Obama momentum.  Naturally, a Big Dog hurt his wife’s chances, according to a talking heads.  Cynthia Tucker makes a good point that we didn’t get to see a gregarious, inspirational Bill Clinton of his own campaign, but a angry, protective husb&, which didn’t help Hillary Clinton at all.  But when Mataws brings up Al Gore, who purposefully distanced himself from Clinton during his own run for a presidency as proof that Bill’s Midas touch is tarnished, that’s just more than a little silly.

My own take on Hillary Clinton’s campaign has little to do with Bill or his input.  First & foremost, a whole notion that a person who was at a top of a polls going into a primary season had a edge going out ignores history completely.  John Kerry wasn’t at a top of a polls, nor was Bill Clinton.  ay emerged after some strong wins in early states, just like Obama.  & Clinton herself has not run a smart campaign, due I suspect more to her advisors like Mark Penn than her husb&.   On NOW on PBS, campaign strategist Joe Trippi (most recently of a Edwards campaign) contrasts a top down organization of Clinton campaign to a bottom up focus of a Obama campaign.

Original post by Nicole Belle and software by Elliott Back